Steven Seagal Exposes Deep State Coup

Real life martial artist, last I heard he was an 7th degree black belt in Aikido, Hollywood action start (in more than one way, in real life), Steven Seagal answers questions from Piers Morgan about the fake 'Russian narrative' about Donald J. Trump.

Seagal who burst onto the big screen with the martial arts - action movie Above the Law, which in my opinion was his best, and one of the best martial arts movies, is a conservative. I never knew that.

I know he's personal friends with Russian president Vladimir Putin due to Putin himself being a martial artist himself. Putin is a black belt in 'Judo,' which for a man of his height is the perfect martial art that I would personally recommend anyone of his height to get involved in, were they looking to go into martial arts.

While Putin's height is somewhat of a mystery, he's said to be anywhere between 5'3" to 5'7" depending on the source. Judo being mainly an art involving grappling and throwing, is the perfect art for someone that height due to having a lower center of gravity. So Putin (whether it was his choice, or recommended to him) is in the art that I would recommend to anyone around that height.

So Putin and Seagal have been friends for many years now. Seagal has traveled to  Russia originally to promote the art of 'Aikido,' which Seagal is a master of. If you've seen any of his movies, the style is very nice and smooth to see. However, from a realistic perspective, there isn't a fight out there that would resemble anything like what you've seen in those movies. Nonetheless, it is a beautiful art to watch.

While on the Piers Morgan show, Seagal was asked about his take on the Trump 'Russia narrative,' and Seagal's answer was astounding. He was very candid and honest, and told Morgan that he himself has 'put his own life in danger for America,' and that basically this Russian meddling is a joke, that has been promoted by the 'Deep state,' along with Obama hold-overs.

In watching this brief video clip, I saw a side of Steven Seagal that I never knew. I've followed him as far as his martial arts life is concerned, being a 'lifelong' practitioner myself. I've also heard some about his spiritual life, which to many in the martial arts is a big part of their lives. But I've never known, nor heard anything about his political leanings.

So to hear a big name Hollywood star, who by the way likes Trump was very refreshing. But even more than that was his 'honesty and sincerity.' This guy just sat back, in Russia where I understand he lives, and spat out the truth. And he is still active in Hollywood, so its not like he's out of Hollywood and free to speak his mind, unlike most whom are basically living in fear of what they say, especially about politics in a climate where 'political correctness' is a way of life.

...but being a martial artist tends to free you from many things that would otherwise 'shackle' you were it not for the confidence bestowed upon you when you're into martial arts. By the way, Seagal was sitting in front of 'Red Square' in Moscow for the interview. Piers Morgan of course, couldn't resist in pointing that out, as though somehow that makes you disqualified to speak on behalf of your fellow countrymen, Morgan not included, being a Brit.

Please excuse the heavy emphasis on the martial arts, as this was meant to be more about politics than anything else, but when you're talking about a fellow martial artist whom I just happen to learn is also a 'conservative' one can't help but point out that Seagal is more apt to speak his mind knowing what he knows. Yes, the arts tend to bring out a great amount of self-confidence in oneself's ability to speak from the heart, and soul for that matter.

As for Morgan, I've also just learned that he himself is a 'closet conservative!' So that too is yet another shocker to say the least! We (on the right) rightfully so, I might add, tend to view Morgan as this hard-core leftist, and he was playing the part, but that was then. Apparently Morgan has a new show, at least that I'm aware of, and he's also now living back in his native country of England. So between those two aspects, maybe there will be a visible change at least to some extent on Morgan's behalf. And no, this is no endorsement nor approval of Morgan. That is something that will take a lot more than a change of address and a new show.

Having said that, Morgan surprisingly was 'fair' in his questioning of Seagal, with the only expection the comment about Seagal simply being in Russia, as though there was something wrong about that imagery. Knowing politics and the media such as I do, I'd say Morgan was simply attempting to flex his little muscles- for show purposes. Inwardly, he probably was agreeing with his guest. Besides, he no longer has CNN, or MSNBC signing his paychecks.

So, overall this was a refreshingly interesting interview between what most would suspect to be two 'leftists,' who are truly conservatives. One a mainstream media host, and the other a Hollywood action star. After having viewed this I came away with the notion that Steven Seagal is a much more 'wide awake' Hollywood star, than even I would have suspected. And as I had long suspected, it would appear to me that Seagal has 'worked for the government' in one capacity or another. While most in Hollywood are 'wannabe's,' Seagal, in my opinion is what other action stars would want to be like one day, when they grew up.

Next time you hear some leftist point out how evil and wicked Russia is, and how they 'meddled' in our last election, point out the truth, and ask yourself, just what would be so bad were Russia and the United States to 'work together,' and 'get along?' Does it serve in our best interests to have Russia and Putin as 'enemies,' or as 'partners,' working together to help one another, fight terrorism, and better yet, improve and enrich the lives of each countries citizens?

And as I conclude this post, let me give you a little perspective on where I'm coming from. I was born during the height of the 'cold war.' I still remember as a child living in a world where at school we had 'duck and cover' drills. I was at the tail end of those who were taking those drills, but I still remember them. I also remember as a child how being called a 'commie,' or a 'Ruskie' was a horrible thing. I wasn't personally called those things, I'm simply pointing out it was the norm at the time. Russia was 'the enemy.' To be called a 'Ruskie' were fighting words. Sound familiar? I guess the more things 'change,' the more they remain the same.

See, the fact is when I was growing up, Russia was a 'communist nation.' We were at the height of the 'cold war.' Both countries resented and disliked each other, and needless to say distrusted one another. But all of that has changed. The fall of the Berlin wall effectively 'closed the cold war,' and Russia was no longer the communist nation it once was. They were now openly seeking capitalism, and the chains and shackles of communist oppression were removed off of the Russian people. And all of this took place between the years of 1989- 1991.

So here we are in 2017, and its been quite some time from 1991. Russia has reformed itself and is basically a capitalist nation, with free markets and a more open and humane environment for its citizens. Russia now actively promotes 'life,' rather than placing a cheap price-tag on it. A lot has changed in Russia. And yet for some reason, much of which wasn't even an issue until Donald Trump was elected to become our 45th President of the United States happened. The media ha concocted this entirely patently absurd notion that somehow, someway Russia 'meddled' in our election. And that Trump himself may be a 'Russian agent.' All of this all because the left's candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the most corrupt political presidential candidate ever to run for office, at least in modern times lost an election that the media, using 'fake polls' had leading her opponent by double digits, when it was all a rouse to demoralize not only her opponent, but the will of the American people- failed.

...and the rest, as they say is history. Thank God! Yet America, thanks to Obama and Hillary are left as divided as it ever has been. As Trump attempts to achieve unity, and restore some semblance of what this country was like (and make it better than ever!), we still have Obama, Hillary, the media and last but not least, the 'Deep state,' working together as did as agitators, using old Soviet and Nazi brown-shirted tactics to do whatever it takes to destroy America and bring her to her knees. We need modern day Paul Revere's sounding the alarm, not against or for a 'foreign invader,' but this time from a 'domestic' enemy.

Our representatives who were sent to Washington to 'serve us' (they're not authorities, though they'd have you believe this, they serve us!) upon taking office, raised their hands, one on the Bible, and the other in the air, to 'serve, defend and protect' the American people and all that it represents, against enemies, 'both foreign and domestic.' Other than for those who are here 'illegally,' or have come here to commit acts of 'terrorism,' its time, like never before in our history, to put the emphasis, not on foreign enemies, but from 'domestic enemies!' Donald Trump (love him or hate him), and his entire administration are (for now) responsible for unifying this country. And all those who would stand against him and block, oppose, obstruct and otherwise need to be held accountable for their actions like never before. And this applies to not only those on the left, but those on the right as well. I'm speaking of the Mitch McConnell's, the John McCain's and the Paul Ryan blue-blooded elitist slime that reside and are just as guilty as anyone else on the other side for blocking the president of the United States of America. Its time to do the right thing- not for yourselves, not for your re-elections, but for the good of America and of all its people! 

To hell with the 'deep state,' and anyone associated with it. May your plans fumble and fall, and may justice, the rule of law and the American people wake up and rise above your heads. You've uncovered your faces, and exposed yourself for all to see. American will only heal and prosper when these people are fallen and knocked off their high horses. Let freedom Reign!

Here is the video of Steven Seagal exposing the Deep state coup! 

Shocking video shows Bronx man when he slips into coma after nine hours of neglect at hospital

Imagine going to the emergency room (ER) only to end up 'dying of neglect?' Well that's what happened to one NYC man. 

As soon as I read the headline, I said to myself I bet this is a 'city run hospital.' Well, sure enough when you read the article, it was indeed a city run hospital. Those are basically for the poor in urban areas.

So there's a perfect example of 'Obamacare!' Working really great, don't you think? And just think- the government has made it mandatory for 'pay for this crap!' Unless of course, you're more affluent.

Thankfully I don't need to depend on that Obamacare trash. I have 'real insurance.' But it shouldn't be like this. No one should 'die' from neglect at any hospital! No matter what your income is, this should not be happening. I hope that family wins a major lawsuit from that hospital.

Speaking of 'Obamacare,' the idiot GOP who came into power promising to 'repeal and replace' have done- NOTHING! I'd read somewhere shortly after Obamacare had passed that once the GOP were in control, they wouldn't touch Obamacare- due to the 'power' it gives them.

Well, time has proven this out to be true. The GOP isn't EVER going to do anything about Obamacare. At least not with the bums who currently serve. Should the American people stand up and throw these bums out, then and only then does America have a chance to be spared from Obamacare.

Then maybe we will at least hear less stories like this one.

GOP Senator: ‘It’s A Mistake’ To Fight Trump

Well, at least one GOP senator has come to the defense of our new president. Rep. Mel Blunt (R-MO) who on a Sunday talk show stated, "It's a mistake to fight Trump," said on Meet the Press, on NBC (a station that's been very critical of Trump). 

I still remember on inauguration day seeing this senator playing a key role in managing some of the 'welcome ceremonial festivities' for the newly elected president. And while many big name congressman and congresswomen were in attendance, not all were there to truly welcome the new president. Many in fact were there for purely selfish reasons. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) almost took a pen the new president had just used that was meant for another person, and almost kept it for herself. No big surprise there.

...people taking other person's things. In all fairness, it goes 'both ways' though. Sen. Schumer was in attendance. Perhaps in celebration of how as 'newly elected senate minority leader,' he would oppose the president on any topic, for any reason, all for the purpose of scoring 'political points. Being now 8 months into the Trump administration, Trump has had to withstand criticism after criticism from even members within his own party. So I'm sure many republicans in attendance for the festivities were also there just for historical purposes.

While I believe in what Trump is attempting to achieve, for the most part (there are several policies Trump has spoken about, or intends to implement or working on, that I do not agree with); but for the most part I agree with the president, and stand with him. And believe me when I say, I have held him 'accountable!'  I have lost many 'Trump supporters,' on social media, simply because they may not be 'regular followers,' (especially of this blog), and may have seen a 'Tweet' of myself criticizing the president, and 'poof,' I''ll end up 'unfollowed' by someone, for having been mistaken as being anti-Trump! It's almost funny, were it not a loss based on an inaccurate assessment of my words.

Even if you support Trump, or any politician, it is your duty to not simply follow them 'blindly,' but keep them in check! And in this article, Sen. Blunt himself alludes to what I just wrote when he made this comment,

“It’s not a mistake to disagree when you disagree,” he said on NBC’s “Meet The Press.” “It is a mistake to suggest that somehow this president, who was elected just as the Constitution prescribed and has the responsibility to lead the country, that somehow we need to not work with this president I think is a bad road to go down. I think it’s a mistake to get in a fight with the president.”

So, obviously since no one is perfect and we will have disagreements, it doesn't mean that we need to 'throw away the baby with the bathwater,' as the saying goes. There will be disagreements. And I do not believe in 'blind obedience,' unfortunately when it comes to Trump, there are some who are so defensive about him that any comment that even remotely smacks of criticism will incur the wrath of some. That is not healthy.

And yet this is what you get from a person also mentioned in this article from former senator John Danforth (R-MO) when he makes polar-opposite comments such as this,

“We cannot let Donald Trump define the Republican Party,” the former lawmaker wrote. “We are not like him. We cannot let the public image of our party be confused with the image of Donald Trump. We have to insist that he is very different from what Republicans have been and what we are.”

Danforth went on to call the president the “Divider-in-Chief.”

I'm sure former senator Danforth is the perfect example of a a 'never-Trumper,' and obvious GOP elitist.  These kind are almost as bad, if not worse than those on the left. And this has been one of Trump's biggest obstacles- his own party! While we've never quite had a president like Trump before, a 'first time politician,' that isn't the problem. Trump has been a breath of fresh air and just the person you would expect to be the one who can 'drain the swamp,' as he himself has stated on many occasions. However, it would seem at times as though it is the 'swamp that is doing all the draining!' And that has been very frustrating for many, not the least being the president himself. But that's how Washington D.C. has been operating for a very long time.

Ultimately, we need to at the least, give the man a chance! Let him know when you agree with him, but also do the same when you do not agree with him. This is what democracy is all about. This is also why the left is splintered right now. And I don't buy into the two-party system. I am non-partisan.

House Joint Resolution 76: Warrentless House Searches!

I just found a 'brief' video on "House Resolution 76," which was posted within the past hour. I'd written a post about this very bill earlier today. Look under Sunday Aug 27th for this post. So, this is something I've already covered.

As this bill is written now, it will affect persons living near the D.C. metro rail which covers residents from VA, MD and DC (for now). But don't be surprised should similar bills be passed in a city near you. Much more could be said about this, but without further ado, I'm posting a 'video' covering this very topic.

The title of the video is:

Congress Overwhelming Approves Warrantless House Searches

...and it comes courtesy off YouTube by The Daily Sheeple. This video is just over 6 minutes in length.

President Pressures GOP To Pass Health Care

President to GOP: Get Rid of Filibuster, otherwise few bills will pass congress; (paraphrase) of a Tweet apparently Trump already Tweeted this morning? Couple that Fox News' headline of Trump's Tweet with the headline of this post, President Pressures GOP to Pass Health Care, and you can understand why some are 'questioning Trump's mental state,' which I don't agree with because it's purely politically driven by the democrats.

But when you take into account the fact that congress has already taken I believe 2 votes on the GOP version of their 'health-care bill,' and lost, even Trump himself stated, "let's just allow Obamacare to fail." and it does seem somewhat strange. And Trump is telling congress to 'drop the filibuster,' yet another political ploy again due to the democrats not willing to go along with anything that Trump wants to do, and you've got to scratch your head at the very least.

We're dealing with a 'stubborn' democratic party who has yet come to terms that Hillary Clinton 'lost' the election fair and square, even though behind the scenes while the mainstream media will not report on this, Clinton (who stole the democratic presidential 'nomination' from a socialist of all persons whom she couldn't defeat), and we learn that the "reptilian" known as Hillary Clinton was 'alleged' to have stolen up to 5 states in the general election against Donald Trump.

Voter fraud has long been an issue in politics in America, so it shouldn't come as a surprise that we had yet another election where 'voter fraud' was a component of this heavily contested race. The fact most of the states use 'electronic voting machines' that leave no traceable evidence proving which way a vote was cast, and you've got a recipe for disaster! So when Trump or possibly one of his 'surrogates,' suggest that Clinton did not win the 'popular vote' due to illegal aliens having cast votes in many areas of the country, which any way you look at it is a crime in itself.

This is the very reason why Obama along with the democratic party were rushing in 'illegals' into America and just in time for the presidential election. It was also reported that very shortly after these illegals would arrive in America, they were being bused to certain locations across the country and 'registered to vote' as democrats of course, as these people were basically also wined and dined.

Welcome to America!

The website Zero Hedge has written an excellent article about 'voter fraud in America,' stating some of the point I outlined here, but in fuller detail. Being that I'm still feeling under the weather with some type of illness for which I'm waiting on 2 separate test results, I'll post the link here to that article, titled

Electronic Voting Machines & Why Voters Should Be Suspicious Of Every Election. 

Equally as bad though is the fact that many believe incorrectly that because Hillary Clinton 'allegedly' won the 'popular vote' she should have won the election, which though that would make sense, but due to our system being a "republic," elections are decided indirectly by so-called 'electors,' a group of people chosen in advance who cast the ballots for which they have been 'pledged' to cast on behalf of whom the 'electoral collage' has mandated. Don't ask me to repeat that again! 

It's one complicated system that was originally designed at the founding of the United States so that no one state would have more power than a smaller state with a smaller population, thus dictating just who would win the actual election, acting at the behest of the system's rules. Again, a very complicated concept to explain, even when a person isn't feeling 'under the weather.' But I tried my best. 

This is why there has been much talk in recent years of doing away with the 'electoral collage,' and using the whoever wins the 'popular vote' hands down, plain and simple, minus the fraudulent voting systems of course who are run by less than honorable persons. It's just a mess, and no one seems to be in any hurry to make any changes, let alone do anything about these voting machines that leave no trail whatsoever, with few exceptions. That alone is a topic for another post! 

Anyone who recalls the 2000 election fiasco which ended up being decided by the Supreme Court, in Bush v Gore, may recall or notice some slight similarities between the 2000 election, which unlike Hillary- the 'robotic' Al Gore challenged his opponent when the votes which were cast ended up being so close of a race, they (Bush and Gore) allowed the Supreme Court to make the ultimate solution to a race which did have 'paper ballots,' yet many were virtually 'unknowable' as to which candidate the ballot was cast in favor for. 

Being 'non-partisan,' I'll close saying this. Gore lost and went on to become the 'climate change' spokesman of the world, and Bush went on to become a 'war criminal,' and horrible president. And the rest, as they say is history! 

Majority in the House is up for grabs

And as though things were not 'bad enough' in the Senate, we've got this headline which is gaining traction on all the major media talk shows. "Mama Pelosi," who doesn't even seem to know what 'planet' she's on, talking about being "Speaker!"

Well, with yet another slime-ball (current Speaker) Paul Ryan (R-WI), who just happens to be now 'former' Trump Chief of staff, Rience Priebus' good buddy, whom most likely was a part of the leakers from Trump's administration, well it would seem to me as though Ryan would love nothing more than to LOSE the GOP 'majority.'

And MOST of these clowns were elected on the promise of "repealing and replacing Obamacare," something Americans have been expecting and waiting ever so patiently- for 7 years now! And there is nothing more Pelosi would LOVE than to regain her "gavel" (and broomstick too). Here she is pictured below...,

                                    Nancy Pelosi...oops, wrong picture

                                 "Momma" Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)d


I believe she looks better in the 'first picture,' dressed in her 'normal' outfit. Seems like just yesterday when this babbling dumb*ss, was waving her 'magic gavel' around town,

Ah yes, good old fashioned "San Francisco values!" Those were the good old days. And as for agenda, I suppose on her agenda would be empower the LGBTQL, giving them even more 'special rights,' just before beginning the 'impeachment' and there you have it. As for Paul Ryan, he can spend more time on the golf course with his good Reince Priebus!

Senate Republicans slowly turning their backs on Trump

I think these 'spineless' GOP hypocrite 'Senators' need to grow up and grow a pair, and stop acting like a bunch of 'spoiled brats!'

"Turning your back" against a president who beat the odds in so many ways, defeating the criminal 'Clinton machine,'    

Just seeing this senator (pictured below) who once stood together with Trump, and now is on record saying,                                                                                                              

“We work for the American people,” Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina said  Just seeing this senator, pictured below who once stood together with Trump, and now is on record saying, Tuesday. “We don’t work for the president."

                      Sen Tim Scott, R-SC ('conservative darling of the GOP')

 Makes me SICK! And this guy hasn't even been in the Senate for very long! I still remember seeing him as a candidate, appearing on 'conservative TV shows like Sean Hannity and others, acting like he was going to be a great senator standing up for the 'conservative cause,' again- just makes me SICK!

Just in: Senate Vote Result on Repeal of Obamacare...

The results have just been released, and the Senate vote to "repeal Obamacare..." has FAILED!"

All this, despite even a 'provision' to allow for up to 2 years to come up with a "better plan," and yet the vote has still FAILED!

I'm going to predict right now, the Republican party is going to be in 'big trouble' come next year when the mid-term elections occur. As it currently stands, the GOP 'owns' BOTH the House and the Senate (along with the presidency).

Yet, with all the 'in-fighting' among GOP lawmakers in both the House and the Senate, and now yet another 'defeat,' there's going to be a price to be paid by the republican party.

Never mind the democrats. They've done nothing but perpetuate this entire false "Russia-gate" narrative, and just as bad have been nothing but "obstructionists!" The partisanship in Washington is at an all time high, and I would put ALL the blame on both Hillary Clinton ("Resist") and Obama, now a 'private citizen' who's actively been working behind the scenes to "oppose Trump" which is unprecedented in the history of the United States when it comes to 'former presidents,' whom have traditionally had 'nothing to say' with respect to their successors.

But of course 'Obama' has NEVER been your 'typical' politician. And his own actions, as "president" showed all along his 'dislike' for his own country. Why Obama was never "impeached" (as during his 2nd term in office) the republicans ran BOTH the House and Senate, ironically (understatement) having taken back control on their "promise to repeal and replace" Obamacare!

So, just as President Trump stated only yesterday, the Republicans came into power on the "promise" of repealing and replacing "Obamacare," and have failed (miserably, I might add). I'll take it even a step further by saying, they haven't even 'tried,' until Trump won the presidency! So much for these Republicans "promise!" Is it any wonder why politicians have such a 'low approval rate?'

I think not.

Get ready for all hell to break loose as the president learns about the results to today's Senate outcome. One thing I think we can all be sure of is Trump will most definitely 'speak out' about his own party's failure to 'keep their promise.' And while theses GOP "idiots" in the Senate (and House) probably think 'most' have forgotten just how and why the republican party was able to re-take the House, and the Senate, I'm sure many Americans have not.

Yet, in another unrelated vote, the House has "passed" various "sanctions" targeting Russia, Iran and North Korea. I don't know about you, but I think "health care" is just a little more important than these 'stupid sanctions' that most Americans could probably even care less about.

It was only days ago that this year's Congress was named as being one of (if not) THE "most unproductive" Congress in over 160 years. I've said it before, and I'll continue saying it until it happens, the GOP is in 'desperate' need of new leadership in both the House and the Senate. Paul Ryan (Speak of the House) and Mitch McConnell (Senate Majority leader) have both proven themselves totally at odds with not only the American people, but with their own president.

Conservatives target Congress, not Trump, after healthcare collapse

I'll let this post 'speak for itself,' as Hugh Hewitt has done a nice job of saying what needs to be said. h/t: Hugh Hewitt

 "People are furious. And not one ounce of it is directed at Trump,” Meckler said."

This article is about the debacle GOP "leadership" has caused due to it's inability to at the very least "repeal Obamacare." Damn right, "people are furious!"

Here's the link.

PS, and we ALL know 'who's to blame!'

Tensions reach new high between Trump, GOP

From The Hill (now Trump 'friendly') "conservative publication," (or whatever they claim to be, could care less, they're worthless!, put out this headline,

          Tensions reach new high between Trump, GOP

If you read the 'article,' it would appear as though you have a bunch of "clueless IDIOTS," ALL GOP attempting to as "Keystone cops," repeal and replace this horrid 'law' known as "Obamacare."

Let's see, the GOP runs it ALL! Yet, when it was the democrats who "ran it all," they just RAMMED this horrendous bill down the throat of EVERY American citizen, not even telling people what was in it, "you'll just have to pass it, to see what's in it," said Speaker "Mama" Pelosi, who can't even put a sentence together, let alone even know 'who' the current president's name is (see her many interviews in which she calls Trump, "Bush").

I have and never will be a "rubber-stamp" for Trump. I'm no Alex Jones who practically 'worships the man,' and has turned his once "anti-establishment" show into a now "Trump (worshiping) channel." I have, and always will hold Trump accountable, though I do agree with MOST of what he stands for, aside from this "ridiculous" OPIOID EPIDEMIC, "BS" which came straight out of left field during the 2016 election season.

While there may be an "Opioid epidemic," is NOT due to "prescription pills," it's ALL about "HEROIN OVERDOSES!" DUH! As I've said many times, try walking into a doctor's office and try to get a "prescription" for "opioids!" Doctor's are soo afraid (due to all the government 'regulations') that many who legitimately need it, go through HELL to get a script. Yet we have an "Opioid epidemic?" BS! It's a "Heroin epidemic," let's get that straight!

Aside from that, I'd say Trump is doing an overall 'good job.' He does need to fire his 'chief of staff,' and maybe dump some other cabinet members, such as his son-in-law, and his own daughter, NEITHER of which should have any place in his administration, especially when they've been caught "hob-nobbling" around with high profile Clinton 'donors,' and other's who are CLEARLY 'anti-Trump.' Are they that freaking stupid? Apparently so!

Secondly, WHY hasn't Trump gone on 'OFFENSE,' and the hell with being on "defense," with this stupid made up "Russia narrative," and GO AFTER and put Obama and Hillary BOTH on "defense" for any number of things! Just who is 'advising Trump?' Which brings me to my next point- GET RID OF VP PENCE! I don't trust that guy as far as I can spit! He's been doing some very 'suspicious things' behind Trump's back. Hosting a dinner party for "his own PAC?" Just what exactly is THAT about?

Say what you may about Trump, but at least he has a 'vision' for America. He knows exactly what he wants to do, and has in large part been doing EXACTLY as he said he would do. So what's the problem? Aside the the idiot "coastal democrat party," and the "never-Trumpers," he's basically surrounded by "life-long career politicians who have been THE PROBLEM for far too long. It's high time, the constituents of these 'anti-Trumpers' start getting some heat from those who've put them in the positions they currently hold.

Why the GOP Congress will be the most unproductive in 164 years

While I'm not entirely sure whether this title above given by (The Week) is a 'credible one,' or not (due to so much 'fake news' these days), I will say this. President Trump won the White House along with huge GOP victories in several areas, which has not been seen in many years- not for the Republicans anyway.

The GOP won the WH, held both the House and the Senate, another major victory, and should The Week's headline be correct, what will this mean for President Trump after the 'mid-term' election? Historically speaking the majority party tends to lose the House after running all three branches.

And despite all the 'fake polling' numbers (no different than during the 2016 presidential election, you'd think pollsters would have learned their lessons- by now), the simple fact is, should the republicans fail to maintain either the House or Senate (especially the House), the results could mean 'big trouble,' for Trump. We already know well enough the democrats would attempt to 'impeach' president Trump at the drop of a hat!

And despite just 'ramming through' their (GOP) agenda through the House and Senate, as they did during Obama's first term in office, republican leadership ultimately stands to look the as THE 'biggest losers' in all of this, aside from the possible 'impeachment attempt' the dems would make, should they re-take the House. As the saying goes, 'a party divided cannot stand!'

And just who do we (GOP) have to 'blame' for ALL this? Ryan (House) and McConnell (Senate). And you can make a clear argument that neither has acted as though they want to be the 'ruling party!' Worse yet, THEY BOTH seem to be 'fighting,' rather than carrying out the President's agenda. Should the GOP lose either the House or Senate, I think either one, both preferably should be immediately 'removed' from their positions of 'leadership!'

See, BOTH Ryan and McConnell belong to the 'establishment wing' of the republican party, a nice way of saying they're "Never-Trumpers!" But are they stupid enough to no matter to risk owning all three branches of the government? I suppose only time will tell. But one thing

Needless to say, the 2018 mid-term election will be telling as to what will lie in store for the remainder of the Trump administration, the current GOP 'leadership,' needs to replaced!

Colbert mocks Conway by replacing show's cameras with microwaves

Time to be "fair and balanced." So here's some fun at the expense of the GOP. See, I don't believe in "parties," nor am I partisan.

So, here's Colbert poking fun at Vault 7. 

Can Ronna Romney McDaniel unite a fractured Republican Party?

Sorry lady, but you're a "Romney." America has said no, hell no to "family political dynasties!" I don't give a damn if you 'say' you're pro-Trump. You're still a "Romney." She's also had her sights on elective office, give me a break. Enough said. Get off the stage, go away. No "Romney's ever! Go heal your "fractured family!"  I won't even bother to go into the "Mormon cult" thing, though I easily can.

McConnell: Tax reform unlikely by August

Another example of the GOP attempting to stall the Trump administration. Trump wanted tax reform 'before' congress went to recess this August. Now McConnell says, 'won't happen til April- next year.' Probably just after 'tax day?'
I wonder just what does McConnell have to do that is more important?

In the meantime democrats continue to obstruct Trump's appointments, so it's Trump versus BOTH the dems and and the RHINOS. This is why so many are disgusted by politics in general. This is one of the reasons I don't belong to 'either' political party. People had better realize, they're two sides of the same coin.

Here's McConnell's 'lame excuse.' 

Trump's Enemies Not Only Democrats!

While it is easy to see who Trump's 'political enemies' are on the left, few forget that many withing Trump's own party worked very hard during his nomination process (the primaries) to defeat Trump.

These were the GOP "blue-bloods," the elites within the party. Then you have the 'neo-con' faction, which may or may not also consist of some of the elite, blue-bloods. Yet whatever they call themselves, or how you look at them, make no mistake- they 'hate, loath and despise' Trump with as much venom as any democrat.

The list of these people reads like a 'guest list' of just about any Fox News program. People such as: Speaker of the house, Paul Ryan, Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush, Rudy Giuliani ("America's mayor"), Senate Majority leader, Mitch McConnell, Sen John (Vietnam 'choir-boy') McCain, Lindsey Graham, etc, etc. And unfortunately these vipers hold prominent positions within the GOP.

To place ALL the blame on Obama and the democrats would be short-sighted and naive. The phony 'conservative' republicans, aka RHINO's would love nothing more than to see Trump not succeed entirely. Only on things that benefit themselves would they stand in his corner, being ever the 'political swamp monsters they are. This is why I believe in "term limits." The Founding Fathers never intended that serving in government was meant to be a "career." Same hold true for members of the Judicial branch, as they too are prone to lead any country into nothing less than an Oligarchy. Who gave us "Obamacare" if you look it at deeply...Supreme Court, led by no less than a 'Bush nominee,' John Roberts (Knights of Malta); who incidentally after having cast his vote which could have squashed this beast, voted in favor of it...well he traveled) to "Malta" after his difficult decision to pass Obamacare. Really? I don't buy it.

...and I know who and where the Knights of Malta's allegiance truly are with.

Then Trump (for some reason) even has at least 2 members in his own cabinet who in my opinion do not belong there. Chief of staff Reince Pribus, who as former head of the RNC 'withheld' money from Trump that was to be used to spend on television advertising! People have such short memories. Now that little creep is 'chief of staff?' Then you have the VP, (vice president) Mike Pence, who clearly, clearly showed himself off just within the past couple weeks to be yet another "globalist," while speaking on foreign soil in Germany I believe to a group of 'globalists,' may have been EU politicos, don't recall, so much happening all at once. But, Pence is not one I would turn my back on, let alone have as my VP!

But, they say history repeats itself. Just as Ronald Reagan wanted nothing to do with his VP, George H W Bush (Skull & Bones, incidentally so is Ben Carson, sec of HUD?); anyway, Reagan rightly understood who Bush was, and wanted no part of him. But, as has been reported a deal was made, and either Reagan had to accept Bush, or not receive the GOP nomination. Six months later into his first term, Reagan went through a failed assassination (John Hinckley, Jr; who just so happened to have had connections with the Bush family); so, Trump had better keep that in mind! Take a good look at Pence. All you ever hear is how 'admired and respected his in across both sides of the aisles,' right...just like Bush Sr was.

As to 'why' Trump would have these people in their positions, I've heard it explained that 'he has these people there to help him to navigate his way around, until he figures it out.' Sorry- don't buy it! And that comes from one of his biggest 'cheer-leaders' on the alternative news site Infowars.com. I couldn't disagree with their assessment more. There are other people who could have been selected.

Though this post is about Trump's enemies from 'within,' why is he allowing Obama 'hold-overs' to remain in their positions? Should have been fired; Day 1!

My understanding of Sean Spicer is that he is a 'friend' of Reince Pribus. He too needs to go. He may be yet another, if not 'the' leaker. This is really a case of Trump vs the world! Enemies from without, and enemies from within. Kind of a microcosm of what he's sworn an oath to, which is "defend America from both enemies foreign and domestic." Well, Trump just may have more enemies from within, than foreign.

While I think he's done a good job, thus far; one of the first things he needed to do was to go after Hilary Clinton, as promised during his campaign. Looks like it's beginning to haunt him now. By going after Hilary, he'll inevitably end up going after Obama essentially taking 2 of his biggest enemies simultaneously, sending a message to the rest. And that is how military leaders are taught to fight in a war, take off the head of your enemy (metaphorically speaking). Maybe I should send a copy of the Art of War by Sun Szu to president Trump? He is in a war.

As for his military appointments, I am not familiar with any of them, so I won't bother commenting on any of them. But I do know that a 'general' is a political position. So, they too must have an ideology and be partial to whomever promoted them to general.

Bill O'Reilly and His 'Fake News' Blunder

This past week Bill O'Reilly did a 'hit piece' on "fake news." While there is a problem with fake news, not all Internet news is "fake news," yet I don't think O'Reilly 'gets it!' He cited a story about a story I'm very familiar with, which had to do with George Soros (billionaire financier) primarily of the Left. 

When it comes to either "globalism," or the "truth" about 9/11, Bill O'Reilly is on the wrong side of history! This is a man who is either being 'muzzled,' from speaking the truth, or he is in a state of total 'blind denial.' While I do (for the most part) agree with O'Reilly, when he's wrong- he is dead wrong! 

An article was posted on both Infowars.com, as well as Breitbart.com which have spelled out, using charts, with graphs, citing sources which anyone can easily look up, and yes! it was shown 'clearly' that several GOP Congressman, Speaker of the House Ryan, Sens. McCain, and Graham (close buddy) and just about all the 2016 presidential candidates were given money by George Soros.

This is an undeniable fact!

Yet, O'Reilly who did this 'hit piece' report on "Fake News," with his long-time dinosaur former CBS guest, just didn't 'get it.' Had they have taken the time to have done the 'simplest' of journalistic work, they would both have seen that both Infowars.com, and Brietbart.com did indeed 'correctly' report that GOP Congressman had indeed been given money, as well as just about all the 2016 presidential GOP candidates, not to mention the obvious Democratic candidates. 

To make things worse, in the same segment, O'Reilly told his audience, and his guest, "don't believe what you read on the Internet." Really? Isn't he (O'Reilly online?); aren't Fox News online? as are all the major mainstream networks? Yes, all are online. 

O'Reilly in all fairness, whether knowingly, or unknowingly did cite that "fake news," is and will overcome the main-stream media, as it continues to grow. Dinosaur news, such as even Fox News who is turning more into CNN- lite, is losing as are all MSM networks to 'true' Internet news websites! Yet, O'Reilly in his haste, told his audience, "fake news will destroy real news." Ah, "real news" is destroying itself! This past 2016 presidential election was proof of this. 

Here is the link to Breitbart's story on this. 

Here is the link to Infowars.com on the same story. 

I report, you decide! (sarcasm).