I just happened to have briefly tuned into Fox News, something I avoid as much as possible, due to the hypocrisy I see from the people there. Keep in mind, Fox is nothing more than corporate mainstream media, which is at best, the 'lesser of two evils.'
With that in mind, a segment entitled 'Violence in Chicago' on Shannon Bream's program, Fox News @Night was featured. Though I mainly view Fox with the volume 'muted,' and just follow along ...
...via their little child-like headlines, it said Trump and something about 'UN Peacekeepers,' coming to Chicago (?). I just about fell out of my chair.
First of all, I happen to live just outside of Chicago and obviously get local Chicago news, versus having to depend on 'national news channels,' which don't report the truth because they don't know the truth.
This whole 'violence in Chicago,' to me (and I'm sure many others from Chicago) is such a farce- at best. Almost reminds me of another farce, the horrendous 'Opioid epidemic!' For the record, let me clarify this 'opioid epidemic.' I wouldn't doubt that may very well be accurate. BUT, I do not believe that has very much to do with 'prescription drugs,' ie painkiller medications, but has everything to do with 'street drugs,' ie heroin, etc.
...research documented facts about American soldiers whose bodies were sent back to America with the government having stuffed their body cavities with 'illegal drugs,' that ended up being sold and distributed right here in AmeriKa!
And when it comes to 'street drugs,' the biggest drug dealers in America, and the entire world for that matter are the Eastern establishment families using the US government, to literally bring in these drugs, which flood the urban streets, and line the pockets of the elitist drug dealing families such as the Bush and Clinton family, along with a host of other criminal families from America, and overseas.
...but hey, as Nancy Reagan former FLOTUS stated back in the 1980's at the height of the 'crack cocaine epidemic,' which was found via the 'freedom of information act,' (FOIA), and other declassified documents, it was/is a fact our government has had a long history of smuggling heavy-duty street drugs into the country, and flooding the 'urban areas,' in particular.
...yes, to all 'minorities' stuck in crime riddled urban areas through no fault of their own (in many cases, not always), the government is intentionally targeting you and your children and grand-children, look it up for yourself! But, "just say no!" Oh, so let's declare a 'war on drugs!' Right.
If Trump, or the government were 'seriously concerned' about the drug problem, they'd be investigation themselves! And they could start out by incarcerating the Bush and Clinton families- ASAP! So, stop importing drugs, dumping them into the urban ghetto's which already have enough problems to begin with, then 'preach to me about Chicago!'
See the fact of the matter is, Chicago is as safe a city as any other big city in America. Yet, thanks to 'national cable news networks' which are far removed from Chicago, they just read a script they've been given, with this BS narrative about Chicago being so 'dangerous,' when it's all BS! Of course there are parts of the city many would do best avoiding. That goes for ALL urban neighborhoods, whether it be Chicago, LA, NYC, etc, etc.
All the 'violence' gun shootings, etc, are two things: 1) Black on black crime, and 2) gang related. There 'ya go. Such a difficult problem to figure out and understand, and deal with. Not.
Solution? 'UN Peacekeepers!' (per Trump). Great idea- NOT! Personally, were I to see a bunch of 'foreigner's' patrolling my neighborhood, that would make me furious! And I believe violence would increase as a result- NOT decrease!
Secondly, I can appreciate Trump's concern about the problem, though again, it's not anywhere near as bad as the MSM would have anyone to believe. Having said that, instead of D.C. stepping into the picture, Illinois does have a republican governor, 'Mr Trump.' Why not have a conversation with HIM about the problem? Obviously, the mayor of Chicago, a 'dual-citizen' Israeli Zionist, Rahm Immanuel, liberal democrat (of course), is a worthless individual who has his own agenda.
So, memo to Trump...go over and around Mayor Immanuel and deal with the 'republican governor' of Illinois! What a freaking concept! See, it works like this, Trump; the governor (which he runs- NOT you) has a vested interest in things working out well in the state of Illinois, unlike a president who due to the state being 'blue' all due to one county (Cook county), the entire rest of Illinois, or a good 90 percent is actually 'RED,' so talk to the governor.
And rather than involving 'foreigners' onto American streets, the governor of Illinois could very easily call in the 'Illinois National Guard!' Again, what an amazing concept! For all the talk from idiot's such as Alex Jones, and various alternative 'journalists' whom most have never even been to Chicago, they'd do well to listen to actual persons who live or are from Chicago! Instead we've got these Alex Jones wannabes parroting what he says which truth be told, the guy is not that bright!
So, here is the solution to the 'crime' in Chicago, which as stated is ALL entirely within (NOT 'without') the urban ghetto areas of the city, which exist in all major cities, would be- stop allowing our government to import street drugs, for the elitist families whom have historically made their family fortunes selling drugs off their streets! One need only do a simple search about the history of the 'Opium wars,' to understand these elitist scumbags whom profit large amounts of money at the expense of their fellow man!
That in itself would all but end much of the violence. And IF necessary, worse case scenario only- have the Illinois governor call out the state's National Guard to help police protect our streets. Again, what an amazing solution!
Oh and BTW, mayor Emmanuel (dual-citizen Zionist schlep that he is), has claimed Chicago to be a "Trump free-zone." What a freaking joke, were it not so incredibly stupid! Why does that 'man' have dual-citizenship? Is he a 'Mossad spy?' Who the hell voted for that little piece of crap to be mayor of one of, if not the greatest city in America, if not the world?
...oh, that's right, via rigged elections, and dead people voting, along with illegal aliens voting as well. See, Rahm Immanuel (dual-citizen Zionist schlep) would love nothing more than to destroy Chicago, as doe all these other 'liberal democrats.' Yet the very people who vote for these douche-bags, are the minorities who are ill-informed, and have fallen for the lie that the democratic party stands for their kind. Wake up, minorities! And the Republicans don't fare much better in my book, but at least there is no history of them taking over large cities and making them worse than before they got there.
Screw the UN, and screw Washington D.C. 'interference!' Yes, something needs to be done. Not because it's as bad as the media claims it to be, but so innocent people living in urban ghetto's can be able to get on with their lives!
Mayor Immanuel who incidentally would love to turn Chicago into a 'sanctuary city,' ought to be disqualified from serving as a US citizen working in government, unless he gave up his 'dual-citizenship!' And for the record, NO! Chicago is NOT a 'sanctuary city!' But of course it's Zionist mayor would love for people to believe it is. Obviously he would love to ensure legislation would 'legally' make Chicago a sanctuary city, but until then...he can either decide to give up his 'dual-citizenship,' or get the Hell out of the city where I was proudly born and raised.
For the life of me, I have YET to find anyone who will admit to having voted for that Zionist shill to be 'mayor' of Chicago! Everyone whom I know and have spoken to cannot stand Rahm (dual-citizen Zionist) Emmanuel. And if you really want to know what I think of the little demon, send me an email!
Showing posts with label elites. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elites. Show all posts
Friday, December 15, 2017
Thursday, September 28, 2017
Steven Seagal Exposes Deep State Coup
Real life martial artist, last I heard he was an 7th degree black belt in Aikido, Hollywood action start (in more than one way, in real life), Steven Seagal answers questions from Piers Morgan about the fake 'Russian narrative' about Donald J. Trump.
Seagal who burst onto the big screen with the martial arts - action movie Above the Law, which in my opinion was his best, and one of the best martial arts movies, is a conservative. I never knew that.
I know he's personal friends with Russian president Vladimir Putin due to Putin himself being a martial artist himself. Putin is a black belt in 'Judo,' which for a man of his height is the perfect martial art that I would personally recommend anyone of his height to get involved in, were they looking to go into martial arts.
While Putin's height is somewhat of a mystery, he's said to be anywhere between 5'3" to 5'7" depending on the source. Judo being mainly an art involving grappling and throwing, is the perfect art for someone that height due to having a lower center of gravity. So Putin (whether it was his choice, or recommended to him) is in the art that I would recommend to anyone around that height.
So Putin and Seagal have been friends for many years now. Seagal has traveled to Russia originally to promote the art of 'Aikido,' which Seagal is a master of. If you've seen any of his movies, the style is very nice and smooth to see. However, from a realistic perspective, there isn't a fight out there that would resemble anything like what you've seen in those movies. Nonetheless, it is a beautiful art to watch.
While on the Piers Morgan show, Seagal was asked about his take on the Trump 'Russia narrative,' and Seagal's answer was astounding. He was very candid and honest, and told Morgan that he himself has 'put his own life in danger for America,' and that basically this Russian meddling is a joke, that has been promoted by the 'Deep state,' along with Obama hold-overs.
In watching this brief video clip, I saw a side of Steven Seagal that I never knew. I've followed him as far as his martial arts life is concerned, being a 'lifelong' practitioner myself. I've also heard some about his spiritual life, which to many in the martial arts is a big part of their lives. But I've never known, nor heard anything about his political leanings.
So to hear a big name Hollywood star, who by the way likes Trump was very refreshing. But even more than that was his 'honesty and sincerity.' This guy just sat back, in Russia where I understand he lives, and spat out the truth. And he is still active in Hollywood, so its not like he's out of Hollywood and free to speak his mind, unlike most whom are basically living in fear of what they say, especially about politics in a climate where 'political correctness' is a way of life.
...but being a martial artist tends to free you from many things that would otherwise 'shackle' you were it not for the confidence bestowed upon you when you're into martial arts. By the way, Seagal was sitting in front of 'Red Square' in Moscow for the interview. Piers Morgan of course, couldn't resist in pointing that out, as though somehow that makes you disqualified to speak on behalf of your fellow countrymen, Morgan not included, being a Brit.
Please excuse the heavy emphasis on the martial arts, as this was meant to be more about politics than anything else, but when you're talking about a fellow martial artist whom I just happen to learn is also a 'conservative' one can't help but point out that Seagal is more apt to speak his mind knowing what he knows. Yes, the arts tend to bring out a great amount of self-confidence in oneself's ability to speak from the heart, and soul for that matter.
As for Morgan, I've also just learned that he himself is a 'closet conservative!' So that too is yet another shocker to say the least! We (on the right) rightfully so, I might add, tend to view Morgan as this hard-core leftist, and he was playing the part, but that was then. Apparently Morgan has a new show, at least that I'm aware of, and he's also now living back in his native country of England. So between those two aspects, maybe there will be a visible change at least to some extent on Morgan's behalf. And no, this is no endorsement nor approval of Morgan. That is something that will take a lot more than a change of address and a new show.
Having said that, Morgan surprisingly was 'fair' in his questioning of Seagal, with the only expection the comment about Seagal simply being in Russia, as though there was something wrong about that imagery. Knowing politics and the media such as I do, I'd say Morgan was simply attempting to flex his little muscles- for show purposes. Inwardly, he probably was agreeing with his guest. Besides, he no longer has CNN, or MSNBC signing his paychecks.
So, overall this was a refreshingly interesting interview between what most would suspect to be two 'leftists,' who are truly conservatives. One a mainstream media host, and the other a Hollywood action star. After having viewed this I came away with the notion that Steven Seagal is a much more 'wide awake' Hollywood star, than even I would have suspected. And as I had long suspected, it would appear to me that Seagal has 'worked for the government' in one capacity or another. While most in Hollywood are 'wannabe's,' Seagal, in my opinion is what other action stars would want to be like one day, when they grew up.
Next time you hear some leftist point out how evil and wicked Russia is, and how they 'meddled' in our last election, point out the truth, and ask yourself, just what would be so bad were Russia and the United States to 'work together,' and 'get along?' Does it serve in our best interests to have Russia and Putin as 'enemies,' or as 'partners,' working together to help one another, fight terrorism, and better yet, improve and enrich the lives of each countries citizens?
And as I conclude this post, let me give you a little perspective on where I'm coming from. I was born during the height of the 'cold war.' I still remember as a child living in a world where at school we had 'duck and cover' drills. I was at the tail end of those who were taking those drills, but I still remember them. I also remember as a child how being called a 'commie,' or a 'Ruskie' was a horrible thing. I wasn't personally called those things, I'm simply pointing out it was the norm at the time. Russia was 'the enemy.' To be called a 'Ruskie' were fighting words. Sound familiar? I guess the more things 'change,' the more they remain the same.
See, the fact is when I was growing up, Russia was a 'communist nation.' We were at the height of the 'cold war.' Both countries resented and disliked each other, and needless to say distrusted one another. But all of that has changed. The fall of the Berlin wall effectively 'closed the cold war,' and Russia was no longer the communist nation it once was. They were now openly seeking capitalism, and the chains and shackles of communist oppression were removed off of the Russian people. And all of this took place between the years of 1989- 1991.
So here we are in 2017, and its been quite some time from 1991. Russia has reformed itself and is basically a capitalist nation, with free markets and a more open and humane environment for its citizens. Russia now actively promotes 'life,' rather than placing a cheap price-tag on it. A lot has changed in Russia. And yet for some reason, much of which wasn't even an issue until Donald Trump was elected to become our 45th President of the United States happened. The media ha concocted this entirely patently absurd notion that somehow, someway Russia 'meddled' in our election. And that Trump himself may be a 'Russian agent.' All of this all because the left's candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the most corrupt political presidential candidate ever to run for office, at least in modern times lost an election that the media, using 'fake polls' had leading her opponent by double digits, when it was all a rouse to demoralize not only her opponent, but the will of the American people- failed.
...and the rest, as they say is history. Thank God! Yet America, thanks to Obama and Hillary are left as divided as it ever has been. As Trump attempts to achieve unity, and restore some semblance of what this country was like (and make it better than ever!), we still have Obama, Hillary, the media and last but not least, the 'Deep state,' working together as did as agitators, using old Soviet and Nazi brown-shirted tactics to do whatever it takes to destroy America and bring her to her knees. We need modern day Paul Revere's sounding the alarm, not against or for a 'foreign invader,' but this time from a 'domestic' enemy.
Our representatives who were sent to Washington to 'serve us' (they're not authorities, though they'd have you believe this, they serve us!) upon taking office, raised their hands, one on the Bible, and the other in the air, to 'serve, defend and protect' the American people and all that it represents, against enemies, 'both foreign and domestic.' Other than for those who are here 'illegally,' or have come here to commit acts of 'terrorism,' its time, like never before in our history, to put the emphasis, not on foreign enemies, but from 'domestic enemies!' Donald Trump (love him or hate him), and his entire administration are (for now) responsible for unifying this country. And all those who would stand against him and block, oppose, obstruct and otherwise need to be held accountable for their actions like never before. And this applies to not only those on the left, but those on the right as well. I'm speaking of the Mitch McConnell's, the John McCain's and the Paul Ryan blue-blooded elitist slime that reside and are just as guilty as anyone else on the other side for blocking the president of the United States of America. Its time to do the right thing- not for yourselves, not for your re-elections, but for the good of America and of all its people!
To hell with the 'deep state,' and anyone associated with it. May your plans fumble and fall, and may justice, the rule of law and the American people wake up and rise above your heads. You've uncovered your faces, and exposed yourself for all to see. American will only heal and prosper when these people are fallen and knocked off their high horses. Let freedom Reign!
Here is the video of Steven Seagal exposing the Deep state coup!
Seagal who burst onto the big screen with the martial arts - action movie Above the Law, which in my opinion was his best, and one of the best martial arts movies, is a conservative. I never knew that.
I know he's personal friends with Russian president Vladimir Putin due to Putin himself being a martial artist himself. Putin is a black belt in 'Judo,' which for a man of his height is the perfect martial art that I would personally recommend anyone of his height to get involved in, were they looking to go into martial arts.
While Putin's height is somewhat of a mystery, he's said to be anywhere between 5'3" to 5'7" depending on the source. Judo being mainly an art involving grappling and throwing, is the perfect art for someone that height due to having a lower center of gravity. So Putin (whether it was his choice, or recommended to him) is in the art that I would recommend to anyone around that height.
So Putin and Seagal have been friends for many years now. Seagal has traveled to Russia originally to promote the art of 'Aikido,' which Seagal is a master of. If you've seen any of his movies, the style is very nice and smooth to see. However, from a realistic perspective, there isn't a fight out there that would resemble anything like what you've seen in those movies. Nonetheless, it is a beautiful art to watch.
While on the Piers Morgan show, Seagal was asked about his take on the Trump 'Russia narrative,' and Seagal's answer was astounding. He was very candid and honest, and told Morgan that he himself has 'put his own life in danger for America,' and that basically this Russian meddling is a joke, that has been promoted by the 'Deep state,' along with Obama hold-overs.
In watching this brief video clip, I saw a side of Steven Seagal that I never knew. I've followed him as far as his martial arts life is concerned, being a 'lifelong' practitioner myself. I've also heard some about his spiritual life, which to many in the martial arts is a big part of their lives. But I've never known, nor heard anything about his political leanings.
So to hear a big name Hollywood star, who by the way likes Trump was very refreshing. But even more than that was his 'honesty and sincerity.' This guy just sat back, in Russia where I understand he lives, and spat out the truth. And he is still active in Hollywood, so its not like he's out of Hollywood and free to speak his mind, unlike most whom are basically living in fear of what they say, especially about politics in a climate where 'political correctness' is a way of life.
...but being a martial artist tends to free you from many things that would otherwise 'shackle' you were it not for the confidence bestowed upon you when you're into martial arts. By the way, Seagal was sitting in front of 'Red Square' in Moscow for the interview. Piers Morgan of course, couldn't resist in pointing that out, as though somehow that makes you disqualified to speak on behalf of your fellow countrymen, Morgan not included, being a Brit.
Please excuse the heavy emphasis on the martial arts, as this was meant to be more about politics than anything else, but when you're talking about a fellow martial artist whom I just happen to learn is also a 'conservative' one can't help but point out that Seagal is more apt to speak his mind knowing what he knows. Yes, the arts tend to bring out a great amount of self-confidence in oneself's ability to speak from the heart, and soul for that matter.
As for Morgan, I've also just learned that he himself is a 'closet conservative!' So that too is yet another shocker to say the least! We (on the right) rightfully so, I might add, tend to view Morgan as this hard-core leftist, and he was playing the part, but that was then. Apparently Morgan has a new show, at least that I'm aware of, and he's also now living back in his native country of England. So between those two aspects, maybe there will be a visible change at least to some extent on Morgan's behalf. And no, this is no endorsement nor approval of Morgan. That is something that will take a lot more than a change of address and a new show.
Having said that, Morgan surprisingly was 'fair' in his questioning of Seagal, with the only expection the comment about Seagal simply being in Russia, as though there was something wrong about that imagery. Knowing politics and the media such as I do, I'd say Morgan was simply attempting to flex his little muscles- for show purposes. Inwardly, he probably was agreeing with his guest. Besides, he no longer has CNN, or MSNBC signing his paychecks.
So, overall this was a refreshingly interesting interview between what most would suspect to be two 'leftists,' who are truly conservatives. One a mainstream media host, and the other a Hollywood action star. After having viewed this I came away with the notion that Steven Seagal is a much more 'wide awake' Hollywood star, than even I would have suspected. And as I had long suspected, it would appear to me that Seagal has 'worked for the government' in one capacity or another. While most in Hollywood are 'wannabe's,' Seagal, in my opinion is what other action stars would want to be like one day, when they grew up.
Next time you hear some leftist point out how evil and wicked Russia is, and how they 'meddled' in our last election, point out the truth, and ask yourself, just what would be so bad were Russia and the United States to 'work together,' and 'get along?' Does it serve in our best interests to have Russia and Putin as 'enemies,' or as 'partners,' working together to help one another, fight terrorism, and better yet, improve and enrich the lives of each countries citizens?
And as I conclude this post, let me give you a little perspective on where I'm coming from. I was born during the height of the 'cold war.' I still remember as a child living in a world where at school we had 'duck and cover' drills. I was at the tail end of those who were taking those drills, but I still remember them. I also remember as a child how being called a 'commie,' or a 'Ruskie' was a horrible thing. I wasn't personally called those things, I'm simply pointing out it was the norm at the time. Russia was 'the enemy.' To be called a 'Ruskie' were fighting words. Sound familiar? I guess the more things 'change,' the more they remain the same.
See, the fact is when I was growing up, Russia was a 'communist nation.' We were at the height of the 'cold war.' Both countries resented and disliked each other, and needless to say distrusted one another. But all of that has changed. The fall of the Berlin wall effectively 'closed the cold war,' and Russia was no longer the communist nation it once was. They were now openly seeking capitalism, and the chains and shackles of communist oppression were removed off of the Russian people. And all of this took place between the years of 1989- 1991.
So here we are in 2017, and its been quite some time from 1991. Russia has reformed itself and is basically a capitalist nation, with free markets and a more open and humane environment for its citizens. Russia now actively promotes 'life,' rather than placing a cheap price-tag on it. A lot has changed in Russia. And yet for some reason, much of which wasn't even an issue until Donald Trump was elected to become our 45th President of the United States happened. The media ha concocted this entirely patently absurd notion that somehow, someway Russia 'meddled' in our election. And that Trump himself may be a 'Russian agent.' All of this all because the left's candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the most corrupt political presidential candidate ever to run for office, at least in modern times lost an election that the media, using 'fake polls' had leading her opponent by double digits, when it was all a rouse to demoralize not only her opponent, but the will of the American people- failed.
...and the rest, as they say is history. Thank God! Yet America, thanks to Obama and Hillary are left as divided as it ever has been. As Trump attempts to achieve unity, and restore some semblance of what this country was like (and make it better than ever!), we still have Obama, Hillary, the media and last but not least, the 'Deep state,' working together as did as agitators, using old Soviet and Nazi brown-shirted tactics to do whatever it takes to destroy America and bring her to her knees. We need modern day Paul Revere's sounding the alarm, not against or for a 'foreign invader,' but this time from a 'domestic' enemy.
Our representatives who were sent to Washington to 'serve us' (they're not authorities, though they'd have you believe this, they serve us!) upon taking office, raised their hands, one on the Bible, and the other in the air, to 'serve, defend and protect' the American people and all that it represents, against enemies, 'both foreign and domestic.' Other than for those who are here 'illegally,' or have come here to commit acts of 'terrorism,' its time, like never before in our history, to put the emphasis, not on foreign enemies, but from 'domestic enemies!' Donald Trump (love him or hate him), and his entire administration are (for now) responsible for unifying this country. And all those who would stand against him and block, oppose, obstruct and otherwise need to be held accountable for their actions like never before. And this applies to not only those on the left, but those on the right as well. I'm speaking of the Mitch McConnell's, the John McCain's and the Paul Ryan blue-blooded elitist slime that reside and are just as guilty as anyone else on the other side for blocking the president of the United States of America. Its time to do the right thing- not for yourselves, not for your re-elections, but for the good of America and of all its people!
To hell with the 'deep state,' and anyone associated with it. May your plans fumble and fall, and may justice, the rule of law and the American people wake up and rise above your heads. You've uncovered your faces, and exposed yourself for all to see. American will only heal and prosper when these people are fallen and knocked off their high horses. Let freedom Reign!
Here is the video of Steven Seagal exposing the Deep state coup!
Thursday, August 31, 2017
Trump’s Insubordination Problem–Politico Magazine
Trump’s Insubordination Problem–Politico Magazine and 'endless wars!'
While 'insubordination' is in most jobs a small problem because it's just not tolerated, and usually instant grounds for termination, when it comes to the Trump cabinet, it is being done on a consistent basis and by in large without consequences.
Who would have ever seen this being the case coming from a man who made a living for famously uttering those two words, "You're fired!" on the hit show The Apprentice. And yet this has been not the case in real life, and at the top levels of government. Something just doesn't seem right.
And as this article points out,
When at times it seems as though Trump's own cabinet has been at odds with their own boss to the point of contradicting him on Sunday news shows, something has got to give. I can't help, as I'm sure many others do, as to whether some of this is to blame on his 'chief of staff,' or just who is in charge?
I also find it somewhat unsettling that Trump is surrounded by as many former generals as he is. Recently a well respected psychiatrist was asked about this very question, and the response was described as going back to Trump's childhood, when after a period of heading in the wrong direction, he was sent to a boarding school, and though he never served in the military himself, he fell in love with those who were 'leaders' within the boarding school he attended. I suppose as seeing them almost as 'father figures.'
While I don't know how much sense that really makes, or what difference does this make, obviously Trump did find something impressive with those who were in 'command' at his boarding school. I'm not a psychiatrist, so what would you call that, other than 'odd.'
In the meantime, unless you're a senior official, people around the Trump administration utter statements, no boss would be very please with. While those in higher position of power within the administration seem to be 'free' to contradict, and even demean to an extent some of Trump's statements.
To me, insubordination is grounds for termination, plain and simple. If you are so removed ideologically or otherwise from the person you are serving at the president's leisure, and I submit that your 'loyalties' are just not there, and worse yet, may lie elsewhere. So just why are some of these people even there? Are they simply there 'padding their resumes?'
This definitely is not suiting the president well, and needs to change. While the thought that some of this was due to Trump's former 'chief of staff,' how do you explain this now with a new person in the same position? Oh sure, we've been told that there's not the level of 'infighting' that once existed. But, at what expense? ...that our president has been marginalized? And by just who? I agree with Newt Gingrich when he stated that Trump is being "isolated within his own administration."
All I can say in years of watching presidential administrations come and go, though some policies do change, if you notice closely, the 'major policies,' are by in large the very ones that seem to remain intact. Here is the perfect example, the speech Trump most recently delivered. In it, as for our military being in Afghanistan, which already has been Americas longest ongoing war, to keep that was ongoing just seems to make no sense.
I believe this war has already cost us one trillion dollars with seemingly no strategy, or exit plan anywhere to be seen. Where have we seen this before? Vietnam. Oh, and let's not forget that it was our State Dept's idea to keep the old Soviet Union 'preoccupied' long enough in Afghanistan to cause the country to go bankrupt! ultimately causing its collapse- from within, no less.
Is this truly the plan at work, behind the scenes? Some of us are well read, and have seen this before, and understand the real reasons that lie behind such seemingly ridiculous ideas. Are we going to spend yet another 'Trillion' dollars and cause more servicemen to either lose their lives, or limbs, and all for just what? To guard the 'opium' that the elite have been known to sell through
It's also been long stated that 'Afghanistan is the graveyard of many nations.' Is America to be the latest casualty of a 'failed' and utterly unwinnable war? Is Afghanistan Americas 2nd 'Vietnam War?' Also in Trump's sam underground channels? Not to mention 'arms sales.'
e speech on Afghanistan, let us not forget that he brought up 9/11 for being the orignal purpose for our mission to this God-forsaken country. I have never bought into the notiion that one man 'orchestrated 9/11' (with some help) and from a cave, at that. More like from a 'boardroom' in London or Washington, D.C. would seem more reasonable.
Enough of the insubordination, and enough with the war in Afghanistan, both need to come to an end, or I'll all about gaurantee yet many more years of the sam old story/ie happening. Joseph Goebbels is credited with having stated, "if you repeat a lie, long enough, and laud enough
While 'insubordination' is in most jobs a small problem because it's just not tolerated, and usually instant grounds for termination, when it comes to the Trump cabinet, it is being done on a consistent basis and by in large without consequences.
Who would have ever seen this being the case coming from a man who made a living for famously uttering those two words, "You're fired!" on the hit show The Apprentice. And yet this has been not the case in real life, and at the top levels of government. Something just doesn't seem right.
And as this article points out,
Donald Trump told us that he’d hire the best people. He didn’t mention that he’d be unable to fire them.This is one of the reasons I found it unbelievable that Trump has put up with some of the people in his administration for as long as he has. Many have claimed this is because Trump is a 'loyal person.' If so, he is loyal to a fault. and it isn't serving him well.
When at times it seems as though Trump's own cabinet has been at odds with their own boss to the point of contradicting him on Sunday news shows, something has got to give. I can't help, as I'm sure many others do, as to whether some of this is to blame on his 'chief of staff,' or just who is in charge?
I also find it somewhat unsettling that Trump is surrounded by as many former generals as he is. Recently a well respected psychiatrist was asked about this very question, and the response was described as going back to Trump's childhood, when after a period of heading in the wrong direction, he was sent to a boarding school, and though he never served in the military himself, he fell in love with those who were 'leaders' within the boarding school he attended. I suppose as seeing them almost as 'father figures.'
While I don't know how much sense that really makes, or what difference does this make, obviously Trump did find something impressive with those who were in 'command' at his boarding school. I'm not a psychiatrist, so what would you call that, other than 'odd.'
In the meantime, unless you're a senior official, people around the Trump administration utter statements, no boss would be very please with. While those in higher position of power within the administration seem to be 'free' to contradict, and even demean to an extent some of Trump's statements.
To me, insubordination is grounds for termination, plain and simple. If you are so removed ideologically or otherwise from the person you are serving at the president's leisure, and I submit that your 'loyalties' are just not there, and worse yet, may lie elsewhere. So just why are some of these people even there? Are they simply there 'padding their resumes?'
This definitely is not suiting the president well, and needs to change. While the thought that some of this was due to Trump's former 'chief of staff,' how do you explain this now with a new person in the same position? Oh sure, we've been told that there's not the level of 'infighting' that once existed. But, at what expense? ...that our president has been marginalized? And by just who? I agree with Newt Gingrich when he stated that Trump is being "isolated within his own administration."
All I can say in years of watching presidential administrations come and go, though some policies do change, if you notice closely, the 'major policies,' are by in large the very ones that seem to remain intact. Here is the perfect example, the speech Trump most recently delivered. In it, as for our military being in Afghanistan, which already has been Americas longest ongoing war, to keep that was ongoing just seems to make no sense.
I believe this war has already cost us one trillion dollars with seemingly no strategy, or exit plan anywhere to be seen. Where have we seen this before? Vietnam. Oh, and let's not forget that it was our State Dept's idea to keep the old Soviet Union 'preoccupied' long enough in Afghanistan to cause the country to go bankrupt! ultimately causing its collapse- from within, no less.
Is this truly the plan at work, behind the scenes? Some of us are well read, and have seen this before, and understand the real reasons that lie behind such seemingly ridiculous ideas. Are we going to spend yet another 'Trillion' dollars and cause more servicemen to either lose their lives, or limbs, and all for just what? To guard the 'opium' that the elite have been known to sell through
It's also been long stated that 'Afghanistan is the graveyard of many nations.' Is America to be the latest casualty of a 'failed' and utterly unwinnable war? Is Afghanistan Americas 2nd 'Vietnam War?' Also in Trump's sam underground channels? Not to mention 'arms sales.'
e speech on Afghanistan, let us not forget that he brought up 9/11 for being the orignal purpose for our mission to this God-forsaken country. I have never bought into the notiion that one man 'orchestrated 9/11' (with some help) and from a cave, at that. More like from a 'boardroom' in London or Washington, D.C. would seem more reasonable.
Enough of the insubordination, and enough with the war in Afghanistan, both need to come to an end, or I'll all about gaurantee yet many more years of the sam old story/ie happening. Joseph Goebbels is credited with having stated, "if you repeat a lie, long enough, and laud enough
Sunday, August 27, 2017
Bilderberg 2017: The Agenda and the Full Attendees List
Though it's already come and gone, the annual Bilderberg meeting is still worthy of a mention. They met back in July, here in Virginia only 50 miles from the White House, and with a new president and administration, could that in itself be some kind of message?
Well, again while this event has come and gone, it is the 'agenda,' and the 'people' who attend this annual meeting which by the way gets little to zero media coverage, as it has from their inception, to our knowledge back in 1954. The name 'Bilderberg,' though not an official name of this group of wealthy elites who come from various fields of prominence, has been dubbed 'Bilderberg' because that was the name of the hotel in which this group was first noticed in the Netherlands.
You can find some general information on the group here.
While this group is very secretive (historically), and open to elites only, by invitation (think of the movie, Eyes Wide Shut!) *caution on the video link* (video may contain imagery unsuitable for some); this group which until fairly recently has intentionally been 'denied,' and kept out of the media spot-light for most of its history, until recently, and still it maintains a lot of secrecy (Chatham House rules), and its influence, though unknown is felt globally. Make no mistake, these people get together with a mission, and a plan for the 'year.'
In order to pacify the wild speculation of what goes on in these meetings, Bilderberg Group (as they now call themselves) have their own website. Though they have a new website, I would take whatever is on there with a grain of salt due to how much 'security and secrecy' surrounds this group of people. Honestly, you're better off reading a book about this group by any number of independent investigative journalists, for more accurate information (as much as would be possible, that is).
One of the best sources on this group would be Daniel Estulin who's written a book about this group titled The True Story of the Bilderberg Group. It is probably the best book on the topic.
So while this group has already laid out it's purpose and agenda for the year, I thought posting this article, on the 'agenda and attendees' would serve the public well in as far as helping to understand some of what has been happening in national and international events. Yes, this group has that much power and influence. While not all those who attend these meetings are bad people, you can be sure that those at the 'higher levels' most certainly do have an agenda, and it's not pro-American, nor is it pro-human for that matter. Some of this group's earliest members and founder were 'eugenicists.' So you know they're not looking out for the good of 'mankind.'
This group is looking out for their own interests, and that of possibly those who will serve these people.
Well, again while this event has come and gone, it is the 'agenda,' and the 'people' who attend this annual meeting which by the way gets little to zero media coverage, as it has from their inception, to our knowledge back in 1954. The name 'Bilderberg,' though not an official name of this group of wealthy elites who come from various fields of prominence, has been dubbed 'Bilderberg' because that was the name of the hotel in which this group was first noticed in the Netherlands.
You can find some general information on the group here.
While this group is very secretive (historically), and open to elites only, by invitation (think of the movie, Eyes Wide Shut!) *caution on the video link* (video may contain imagery unsuitable for some); this group which until fairly recently has intentionally been 'denied,' and kept out of the media spot-light for most of its history, until recently, and still it maintains a lot of secrecy (Chatham House rules), and its influence, though unknown is felt globally. Make no mistake, these people get together with a mission, and a plan for the 'year.'
In order to pacify the wild speculation of what goes on in these meetings, Bilderberg Group (as they now call themselves) have their own website. Though they have a new website, I would take whatever is on there with a grain of salt due to how much 'security and secrecy' surrounds this group of people. Honestly, you're better off reading a book about this group by any number of independent investigative journalists, for more accurate information (as much as would be possible, that is).
One of the best sources on this group would be Daniel Estulin who's written a book about this group titled The True Story of the Bilderberg Group. It is probably the best book on the topic.
So while this group has already laid out it's purpose and agenda for the year, I thought posting this article, on the 'agenda and attendees' would serve the public well in as far as helping to understand some of what has been happening in national and international events. Yes, this group has that much power and influence. While not all those who attend these meetings are bad people, you can be sure that those at the 'higher levels' most certainly do have an agenda, and it's not pro-American, nor is it pro-human for that matter. Some of this group's earliest members and founder were 'eugenicists.' So you know they're not looking out for the good of 'mankind.'
This group is looking out for their own interests, and that of possibly those who will serve these people.
Saturday, March 4, 2017
Trump's Enemies Not Only Democrats!
While it is easy to see who Trump's 'political enemies' are on the left, few forget that many withing Trump's own party worked very hard during his nomination process (the primaries) to defeat Trump.
These were the GOP "blue-bloods," the elites within the party. Then you have the 'neo-con' faction, which may or may not also consist of some of the elite, blue-bloods. Yet whatever they call themselves, or how you look at them, make no mistake- they 'hate, loath and despise' Trump with as much venom as any democrat.
The list of these people reads like a 'guest list' of just about any Fox News program. People such as: Speaker of the house, Paul Ryan, Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush, Rudy Giuliani ("America's mayor"), Senate Majority leader, Mitch McConnell, Sen John (Vietnam 'choir-boy') McCain, Lindsey Graham, etc, etc. And unfortunately these vipers hold prominent positions within the GOP.
To place ALL the blame on Obama and the democrats would be short-sighted and naive. The phony 'conservative' republicans, aka RHINO's would love nothing more than to see Trump not succeed entirely. Only on things that benefit themselves would they stand in his corner, being ever the 'political swamp monsters they are. This is why I believe in "term limits." The Founding Fathers never intended that serving in government was meant to be a "career." Same hold true for members of the Judicial branch, as they too are prone to lead any country into nothing less than an Oligarchy. Who gave us "Obamacare" if you look it at deeply...Supreme Court, led by no less than a 'Bush nominee,' John Roberts (Knights of Malta); who incidentally after having cast his vote which could have squashed this beast, voted in favor of it...well he traveled) to "Malta" after his difficult decision to pass Obamacare. Really? I don't buy it.
...and I know who and where the Knights of Malta's allegiance truly are with.
Then Trump (for some reason) even has at least 2 members in his own cabinet who in my opinion do not belong there. Chief of staff Reince Pribus, who as former head of the RNC 'withheld' money from Trump that was to be used to spend on television advertising! People have such short memories. Now that little creep is 'chief of staff?' Then you have the VP, (vice president) Mike Pence, who clearly, clearly showed himself off just within the past couple weeks to be yet another "globalist," while speaking on foreign soil in Germany I believe to a group of 'globalists,' may have been EU politicos, don't recall, so much happening all at once. But, Pence is not one I would turn my back on, let alone have as my VP!
But, they say history repeats itself. Just as Ronald Reagan wanted nothing to do with his VP, George H W Bush (Skull & Bones, incidentally so is Ben Carson, sec of HUD?); anyway, Reagan rightly understood who Bush was, and wanted no part of him. But, as has been reported a deal was made, and either Reagan had to accept Bush, or not receive the GOP nomination. Six months later into his first term, Reagan went through a failed assassination (John Hinckley, Jr; who just so happened to have had connections with the Bush family); so, Trump had better keep that in mind! Take a good look at Pence. All you ever hear is how 'admired and respected his in across both sides of the aisles,' right...just like Bush Sr was.
As to 'why' Trump would have these people in their positions, I've heard it explained that 'he has these people there to help him to navigate his way around, until he figures it out.' Sorry- don't buy it! And that comes from one of his biggest 'cheer-leaders' on the alternative news site Infowars.com. I couldn't disagree with their assessment more. There are other people who could have been selected.
Though this post is about Trump's enemies from 'within,' why is he allowing Obama 'hold-overs' to remain in their positions? Should have been fired; Day 1!
My understanding of Sean Spicer is that he is a 'friend' of Reince Pribus. He too needs to go. He may be yet another, if not 'the' leaker. This is really a case of Trump vs the world! Enemies from without, and enemies from within. Kind of a microcosm of what he's sworn an oath to, which is "defend America from both enemies foreign and domestic." Well, Trump just may have more enemies from within, than foreign.
While I think he's done a good job, thus far; one of the first things he needed to do was to go after Hilary Clinton, as promised during his campaign. Looks like it's beginning to haunt him now. By going after Hilary, he'll inevitably end up going after Obama essentially taking 2 of his biggest enemies simultaneously, sending a message to the rest. And that is how military leaders are taught to fight in a war, take off the head of your enemy (metaphorically speaking). Maybe I should send a copy of the Art of War by Sun Szu to president Trump? He is in a war.
As for his military appointments, I am not familiar with any of them, so I won't bother commenting on any of them. But I do know that a 'general' is a political position. So, they too must have an ideology and be partial to whomever promoted them to general.
These were the GOP "blue-bloods," the elites within the party. Then you have the 'neo-con' faction, which may or may not also consist of some of the elite, blue-bloods. Yet whatever they call themselves, or how you look at them, make no mistake- they 'hate, loath and despise' Trump with as much venom as any democrat.
The list of these people reads like a 'guest list' of just about any Fox News program. People such as: Speaker of the house, Paul Ryan, Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush, Rudy Giuliani ("America's mayor"), Senate Majority leader, Mitch McConnell, Sen John (Vietnam 'choir-boy') McCain, Lindsey Graham, etc, etc. And unfortunately these vipers hold prominent positions within the GOP.
To place ALL the blame on Obama and the democrats would be short-sighted and naive. The phony 'conservative' republicans, aka RHINO's would love nothing more than to see Trump not succeed entirely. Only on things that benefit themselves would they stand in his corner, being ever the 'political swamp monsters they are. This is why I believe in "term limits." The Founding Fathers never intended that serving in government was meant to be a "career." Same hold true for members of the Judicial branch, as they too are prone to lead any country into nothing less than an Oligarchy. Who gave us "Obamacare" if you look it at deeply...Supreme Court, led by no less than a 'Bush nominee,' John Roberts (Knights of Malta); who incidentally after having cast his vote which could have squashed this beast, voted in favor of it...well he traveled) to "Malta" after his difficult decision to pass Obamacare. Really? I don't buy it.
...and I know who and where the Knights of Malta's allegiance truly are with.
Then Trump (for some reason) even has at least 2 members in his own cabinet who in my opinion do not belong there. Chief of staff Reince Pribus, who as former head of the RNC 'withheld' money from Trump that was to be used to spend on television advertising! People have such short memories. Now that little creep is 'chief of staff?' Then you have the VP, (vice president) Mike Pence, who clearly, clearly showed himself off just within the past couple weeks to be yet another "globalist," while speaking on foreign soil in Germany I believe to a group of 'globalists,' may have been EU politicos, don't recall, so much happening all at once. But, Pence is not one I would turn my back on, let alone have as my VP!
But, they say history repeats itself. Just as Ronald Reagan wanted nothing to do with his VP, George H W Bush (Skull & Bones, incidentally so is Ben Carson, sec of HUD?); anyway, Reagan rightly understood who Bush was, and wanted no part of him. But, as has been reported a deal was made, and either Reagan had to accept Bush, or not receive the GOP nomination. Six months later into his first term, Reagan went through a failed assassination (John Hinckley, Jr; who just so happened to have had connections with the Bush family); so, Trump had better keep that in mind! Take a good look at Pence. All you ever hear is how 'admired and respected his in across both sides of the aisles,' right...just like Bush Sr was.
As to 'why' Trump would have these people in their positions, I've heard it explained that 'he has these people there to help him to navigate his way around, until he figures it out.' Sorry- don't buy it! And that comes from one of his biggest 'cheer-leaders' on the alternative news site Infowars.com. I couldn't disagree with their assessment more. There are other people who could have been selected.
Though this post is about Trump's enemies from 'within,' why is he allowing Obama 'hold-overs' to remain in their positions? Should have been fired; Day 1!
My understanding of Sean Spicer is that he is a 'friend' of Reince Pribus. He too needs to go. He may be yet another, if not 'the' leaker. This is really a case of Trump vs the world! Enemies from without, and enemies from within. Kind of a microcosm of what he's sworn an oath to, which is "defend America from both enemies foreign and domestic." Well, Trump just may have more enemies from within, than foreign.
While I think he's done a good job, thus far; one of the first things he needed to do was to go after Hilary Clinton, as promised during his campaign. Looks like it's beginning to haunt him now. By going after Hilary, he'll inevitably end up going after Obama essentially taking 2 of his biggest enemies simultaneously, sending a message to the rest. And that is how military leaders are taught to fight in a war, take off the head of your enemy (metaphorically speaking). Maybe I should send a copy of the Art of War by Sun Szu to president Trump? He is in a war.
As for his military appointments, I am not familiar with any of them, so I won't bother commenting on any of them. But I do know that a 'general' is a political position. So, they too must have an ideology and be partial to whomever promoted them to general.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)