Bill O'Reilly is Forced Out At Fox News

I told you this was coming. Ever since all the 'sexual allegations' that took down Roger Aisles, Fox News, or as I call them 'Faux News,' aka 'porn news' has been on a downward spiral. Now their 'top man' is down.

While I didn't care for O'Reilly, blasted Alex Jones for no reason, believes the official lie about 9/11, etc, he was Fox News in many ways. But with the rise of the 'rogue' Megyn Kelly (total loser), and her departure, it was only a matter of time before other 'conservatives' would be leaving as I've stated here, either by being pushed out, or otherwise.

Fox News is on it's way to becoming CNN-lite and I'm sure the liberals couldn't be happier! And don't be fooled by Fox and their 'conservative leanings,' as far as I can tell, there are only a handful left who are true conservatives, and I'm sure they too are beginning to see the writing on the way!

As for Fox, I don't care for them, dropped them like a hot potato years ago. However, they were and still are the most 'credible' cable news remaining. That's not saying much when there's only 3 cable networks, and the other two are totally "fake news." Obviously O'Reilly has an ego problem, and like most with such problems, eventually they fall of their high horse and they fall hard. But don't feel sorry for O'Reilly, he's still worth millions of dollars, just don't go near him if your'e a decent woman.

Faux News, the Fruits of a Pornography Peddler

So Fox New's Bill O'Reilly is an 'innocent man?' Were that true, why would Fox News have paid out 'millions' of dollars settling cases for him?

The newspaper reported (http://nyti.ms/2nHTteJ ) that O'Reilly or 21st Century Fox have paid $13 million to five women since 2002 over these complaints "in exchange for agreeing to not pursue litigation or speak about their accusations against him."

 Sounds like we have sexual predator here. But O'Reilly claims he's just under attack because woman want to make money off of him. Well, I still recall the 'first time' a charge was brought up against him and he ended up 'settling out of court.' The details were disgusting, I won't even go into them here. But, how interesting other women have made similar claims, involving phone calls and hearing 'sounds?' Coincidence? Or same modus operandi? I believe the latter is true.

Another former frequent guest on O'Reilly's show Andrea Tanaros said in the NYT dated Aug 22, 2016 that,

"Fox News masquerades as a defender of traditional family values, but behind the scenes, it operates like a sex-fueled, Playboy Mansion-like cult, steeped in intimidation, indecency and misogyny." 

Having watched Fox News, and knowing about Rupert Murdoch the Aussie owner who also just happens to promote "pornography," yet claims to be a "Christian," was recently in an article about he should be put out of his church, a church run by none other than another hypocrite "apostate" CFR card-carrying member, Rick Warren, promoter of "ChrIslam" (a combination of Christianity and Islam). He's what this article has to say about not only Warren, but Murdoch,

 “Rupert Murdoch is a born-again Christian and Rick Warren claims to be his pastor,” says Chris Rosebrough, head of the Christian Accountability Network. “As a Christian, Murdoch is committing an egregious sin by owning, expanding and profiting from pornographic channels, and Rick Warren, his pastor, has a biblical duty to call Murdoch to repentance and/or put him out of the church.”

So, as I've been telling people for years, don't believe everything you hear or see reported on Fox News, because if you know who the owner is, you'll know that it's 'fruit is bad.' In addition to reporting many 'false stories,' I've noted, it's only obvious to any viewer that they're selling 'sex' on Fox News. You could call Fox the "pornography of news." But keep on watching them, "Christian" brothers and sisters. Keep on thinking Fox news is "patriotic." Having said that, I will admit there are a 'few' true conservatives there, but I'd say I could literally count the number of 'true conservatives' on my left hand- with fingers to spare!

And to any moron who thinks I'm just another Fox news 'basher,' think again...I don't care for ANY of the main-stream media. They're ALL liars and have an agenda! People need to learn to use their own brains, think for themselves and question everything! Sure I'd rather get my news from a pretty face, but when you've got a culture of all these 'sexual allegations,' (many of which have been settled out of court, or are still pending, something is definitely wrong). As for Murdoch himself, he's as fake a "Christian," as he is a "conservative!" He knows there's a 'market' for conservative news, and so he's filled that need. And nothing wrong with that, but when it's been turned into a "Playboy mansion-cult" as Andrea Tantaros is on record saying, something is very wrong at Fox News. As the saying goes, 'where there's smoke- there's fire.'

Vault 7: CIA Hacking Tools Revealed

If you were to listen to one of the hacks on CNN last name Cuomo (don't know first name, could care less, family all political hacks in NY), this guy told viewers on CNN, "you're not supposed to be looking at these documents," cause only they the 'high priests' of the media are supposed to have access to these documents, right. Such is the nonsensical garbage viewers receive on CNN.

Look at their ratings, tells you all you need to know about them.

Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) says "it's just ridiculous for president Trump to say that former president Obama spied on anyone, let along Trump." Right. Obama (Nobel Peace Prize winner, what a joke), used such intel to conduct a drone attack killing an America citizen overseas.

James Clapper (former DNI under Obama), "there's just no such campaign to wiretap the president-elect." This comes from a person who may have 'perjured himself' during congressional testimony, an investigation may be re-opened against Clapper (hands on, hands off...the 'clapper,' sorry couldn't resist).

And of course who can forget Rep Maxine Waters (D) "this president has killed babies in Korea..." Pelosi, in another interview thought Bush was still president, the list goes on and on. Are the democrats through?

Well, earlier today on the Alex Jones show Dr Steve Pieczenik stated, "the democratic party is done, all we need to do is put flowers on their graves."

With leadership  such as what they have, and show no signs of giving it up, despite most of these people being in their 70's on up, is it any wonder they'd attempt to run basically a "corpse" in Hilary Clinton who was caught having to have an 'ambulance' as part of her motorcade, and collapsing during the Sept 11th memorial in NYC just prior to election day. But, of course that was all "conspiracy theory."

FYI, the term "conspiracy theory" was created by the CIA as a method to poke jabs, make fun of anyone who 'dared question' the official narrative given the American people by the Warren commission about the facts behind the death and murder of JFK. The term has been used ever since, as propaganda to 'shut down' anyone who dares question the official government story, such as has been the case with 9/11. And yes, unfortunately some still do believe the lie about 9/11. Bill O'Reilly and I believe Sean Hannity (especially the former) will get very upset should you even attempt to provide evidence.

So, now with the latest Wikileaks dump, we see that just about 'everything has been hacked,' or at the least has the capacity to be hacked, using 'back-door' methods. So, it was once a 'conspiracy theory' to even suggest your web-cam on your laptop could be used to 'monitor' you, yet one of these high level officials is on record saying, 'they cover their web cams!' Hell, even my primary case physician covers her web cam, noticed that on my first visit! I knew right away, this is an informed person.

So, is it any wonder a two-bit CNN anchor surname Coumo (may be misspelled, could care less) tells viewers, "only we (media) have the right to look at these documents," is it any wonder these people make fools of themselves? Again, their ratings reflect it.

As for Fox News, they're not much better! To be "fair and balanced," I'll never forget Mike Wallace (Fox News Sunday host) in an interview with Rush Limbaugh, his guest used the term "deep state." Wallace (lifelong media journalist, son of famous investigative journalist) did not even know what the term meant! "What is the deep state? I've never heard this term before?" Maybe he ought to talk to some of the 'spooks' all around him! Every news station (national at least) has some around. Anyone who thinks "Operation Mockingbird" is gone, had better re-think things. MSM is still being used very much by the CIA to help run and promote stories they want brought to the forefront.

As I always tell people, always consider the "source" when it comes to your news, and even when it comes to simply choosing to pick a book about particular topics, such as history, religion, politics. There's always going to be a particular 'bias' depending on who the author is. It may be a bias you agree with, it may be a something that leaves you scratching your head. History, in particular has largely been 're-written,' to the point, basically everything you've been taught in schools (public and private) is all wrong! You'd be surprised how many people pick up a book (especially on history) and come away with a completely inaccurate account of what really happened. And I've seen 'big name' people in various walks of life not understanding this.

So it's not wonder, "fake news" has made such a splash in the media. And contrary to (once again) Bill O'Reilly, who tells his people, "don't believe anything what you read on the Internet," seriously? Isn't Fox News on the Internet? I know many would argue they're "fake news" (and to an extent they are), but by in large, they're fairly accurate, when compared to CNN or MSNBC. But, yes of course, there is 'fake news,' as well as there is 'accurate news' to be found online.

Always consider the source. I am well familiar with Wikileaks, and they are a credible source. Doesn't mean they 'always' will be, but for now they are. Speaking of which, here is "Vault 7" as presented by Wikileaks!                                                                                              

Rohrabacher Staffer, 71, Knocked Unconscious By Protestors Delivering Cards

This is the state of American politics and society. When you hear about these so-called "protesters," who are confirmed to be "paid agitators," by billionaire anti-American, socialist treasonous, venomous snake, you can't help but ask why isn't this a**hole charged with "treason," "sedition," you name it.

This Soros creep is a "war-criminal," a person who has stirred conflict and revolutions across the world, and goes on television bragging about what he's done. I have been aware of this scumbag for quite some time being a close follower of American politics, and geo-politics in general. This is a 90 year old 'anarchist,' who was a 'born loser.'

Soros, a Hungarian-Jewish immigrant helped turn over his own people, fellow Jews over to Hitler's concentration camps. Nice man, don't you think? Total loser not only in my eyes, but in most who know who this scum of the earth is and what he's done. There are currently laws on the books with more than enough to have this 'scum' put in prison, or before a firing squad (even that's too good), but from what I have heard, it's a matter of "political will." Well, if those in Washington do not have the 'will' to indict this pig for his crimes, we have a 'broken judicial system. People have been thrown into prisons, for having done nothing compared to the rotten acts this "crypto-Jew" has done.

Enough with this "pig!"

So now it's not just law-abiding American citizens who 'peacefully' protest who are now targets of Soros' "Nazi brown shirt" thugs," now it's congressional aides being attacked! Just when is enough, enough? How many people need to be beaten, including women (see "Woman's March), and even elderly have been targeted for exercising their right to "peacefully protest," an act covered and protected by our US Constitution.

Yet even the media doesn't get it. I can't tell you how many times I've seen "anarchists" throwing "Molotov cocktails" at even the police, and innocent citizens, busting windows, just causing pure 'unlawful carnage,' yet nothing is done. If you want to end this problem, you need to go to the 'source.' Simply locking up these "paid agitators," (and they have been paid by this pig) is not the solution. It's just a band-aide. In cases such as this, you need to lawfully, and legally go for the jugular which is George Soros, "scumbag of the earth."

To make matters worse, this scumbag "publicly funds," many politicians in D.C., mainly democrats, but some republicans as well. This is widely known, yet Fox News' Bill O'Reilly (still believes the official 9/11 government lie), covered a report, which I covered HERE about "fake news." His false narrative is that it was a fake report that several 'key' GOP leaders (people you see regularly on news shows) were given money by George Soros and his Open Borders Foundation (do yourself a favor, and check it out online). It is an incontrovertible fact, several key GOP leaders have indeed received campaign contributions from Soros. So much for O'Reilly's "pseudo-intellectualism." The man's another fool!

It is only a matter of time before one of these Soros thugs will attempt to 'attack' the wrong person, and god help them because in American we do have a 2nd amendment right. Not only that, but you never know if someone you decide to 'attack' may be a trained martial artist. This is a 'ticking timebomb,' just waiting for the fuse to be ignited. Will justice then be brought to bear upon this scum of the earth, also known as George Soros?

PS, Soros is now calling for a "cashless society" for his wet-dream of a utopian New World Order. Look it up! If you followed this past presidential election, you'll remember the chants of "lock her up," with respect to yet another crypto-Jew, Hilary Clinton. And no, do not for a second think I'm anti-semeitic. What I am is "anti" anyone who wants to hurt or destroy my country the United States of America. I do not buy into "political correctness," knowing its social-engineering developed by think-tanks, and various nefarious "black- op projects."

Here's the story from the headline. 

Bill O'Reilly and His 'Fake News' Blunder

This past week Bill O'Reilly did a 'hit piece' on "fake news." While there is a problem with fake news, not all Internet news is "fake news," yet I don't think O'Reilly 'gets it!' He cited a story about a story I'm very familiar with, which had to do with George Soros (billionaire financier) primarily of the Left. 

When it comes to either "globalism," or the "truth" about 9/11, Bill O'Reilly is on the wrong side of history! This is a man who is either being 'muzzled,' from speaking the truth, or he is in a state of total 'blind denial.' While I do (for the most part) agree with O'Reilly, when he's wrong- he is dead wrong! 

An article was posted on both Infowars.com, as well as Breitbart.com which have spelled out, using charts, with graphs, citing sources which anyone can easily look up, and yes! it was shown 'clearly' that several GOP Congressman, Speaker of the House Ryan, Sens. McCain, and Graham (close buddy) and just about all the 2016 presidential candidates were given money by George Soros.

This is an undeniable fact!

Yet, O'Reilly who did this 'hit piece' report on "Fake News," with his long-time dinosaur former CBS guest, just didn't 'get it.' Had they have taken the time to have done the 'simplest' of journalistic work, they would both have seen that both Infowars.com, and Brietbart.com did indeed 'correctly' report that GOP Congressman had indeed been given money, as well as just about all the 2016 presidential GOP candidates, not to mention the obvious Democratic candidates. 

To make things worse, in the same segment, O'Reilly told his audience, and his guest, "don't believe what you read on the Internet." Really? Isn't he (O'Reilly online?); aren't Fox News online? as are all the major mainstream networks? Yes, all are online. 

O'Reilly in all fairness, whether knowingly, or unknowingly did cite that "fake news," is and will overcome the main-stream media, as it continues to grow. Dinosaur news, such as even Fox News who is turning more into CNN- lite, is losing as are all MSM networks to 'true' Internet news websites! Yet, O'Reilly in his haste, told his audience, "fake news will destroy real news." Ah, "real news" is destroying itself! This past 2016 presidential election was proof of this. 

Here is the link to Breitbart's story on this. 

Here is the link to Infowars.com on the same story. 

I report, you decide! (sarcasm).