First of all, how in the world did this woman, Nikki Haley end up in the Trump administration to begin with?
The woman was a 'never-Trumper,' who backed Ted Cruz for president in this past presidential election. Give me a break!
This woman is also a 'globalist,' which stands in complete opposition to everything that Trump campaigned on and against.
On top of that, that woman is a textbook example of a 'neo-con!' For those who do not understand that term, she's one of these moron's who is always on the look-out to find any reason to go 'war' with another country.
...America first? Really?
So I see this woman come crawling out of her cave claiming she had 'undeniable proof' that Iran is in violation of its nuclear agreement.
...okay. And where have I seen this before? Oh that's right, basically the same garbage we, the American people were fed about Saddam Hussein having 'weapons of mass destruction!' One little problem, they didn't.
Yet because of lies, America went to war- over a decade ago with no end in sight! We fought a war of independence from Great Britain and a civil-war in less time than this!
More people have dies over the lie about 'weapons of mass destruction,' when you count innocent civilians, along with US military. All for what?
Oh, that's right. Bankers! They love war! They profit big money from wars. They've been behind every war you can name!
And to see this woman stand before the media with this 'smirk' on her disgusting face, declare she had 'undeniable proof.' Well, so do I lady!
I have undeniable proof, our government had lied many times about their reason's for going to war. I have undeniable proof, wars are 'banker's wars,' and that they stand to profit big-time from any war. I have undeniable proof a highly decorated US general wrote an entire book called, "War is a Racket!"
So keep speaking out of the corners of the cracks out of your lying mouth and tell the American people all about your 'undenable proof!'
...BTW, would you like a 'medal' or a cookie for your hard work?
Gee, I wonder just 'who' stands to gain should our government go to war with Iran? Oh, that's right. Our 'best friends' in the Middle east, the Israeli government, or shall I just call them the land of the Rothschild's? That wonderfully satanic family that had made its fortune through the sale of opium, war, and every conceivable act of debauchery and aggression imaginable.
Its a fact that the United States had no 'national security interests' within the middle east- nada, zero, zilch! Listen to any 'honest' intelligence operative worth his salt. And for the record, the state of Israel is NOT our 'best friends.'
Need validation on that last statement? Look no further than 9/11! Oh I'm sure some may be thinking, are you saying the Israeli government had something to do with 9/11? You bet I am. And you can take that to the bank!
...But the media claimed the Saudis had something to do with 9/11. Yes, they did. But the Saudis and the Israelis are in bed with one another. Both countries 'hate' Iran. So use simple logic and ask yourself, just who really stands to benefit and profit from a war with Iran?
If you guessed the Israeli and Saudi governments, ding, ding, ding!
Many forget that on the day the World Trade center towers were hit, just across the river were a small group of Israeli's viewing the events and celebrating! They happened to have been interrogated by law enforcement, and I'm sure allowed to walk away. Do a search on YouTube for the "dancing Jews!"
And throw away the pathetic images of Fox News and others showing Arab people passing out 'candy' in their countries over 9/11. That has been thoroughly 'debunked' as having absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. Those celebrations were from an earlier period 'prior' to 9/11 and totally taken out of context.
Not so with the 'dancing Jews.' See it's very simple. Our 'best friends in the middle east,' have had lots of problems with terrorism. And for the life of me, I can't imagine why/ Well due to 9/11, now "the Israeli problem is now your (America's) problem." So said one of the 'dancers' when questioned by authorities.
Look, if the Arabs (Saudis) and Jews have 'issues' with Iran, let THEM take care of it. We (the American people) have armed BOTH Israel and Saudi Arabia to the hilt! The state of Israel has an undisclosed amount of nuclear weapons at their disposal. I really do not think they need 'our help,' when they themselves have enough nuclear weapons to blow up the world.
If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times, and will continue to. There is nothing of 'national security value' to the United States in the middle-east! If you're thinking but 'we need their oil.' With the technology of 'shale' and the fact the US has more of its own natural oil, along with Canada and Mexico, explain to me again just why we have any 'interests' in the middle-east? We don't.
Zionism is one of the biggest problems this world faces. It's not 'communism,' or socialism, or anything else. And let me be clear. Anytime I speak of Zionism, I speak of an ideology, not a 'race!' There are just as many non-Jews who are Zionists, as there are otherwise. Zionism is no different than communism, fascism, or what other 'ism's' you can shake a stick at!
Someone please explain to me, why is it that America is capable of having nuclear materials be it for self-defense, or simple energy, as well as 'certain' other nations, yet when it comes to some countries, who the hell are we to dictate to another sovereign nation whether they can have nuclear material?
Doesn't America have the most powerful military and weaponry on the face of the earth? We have plenty of weapon's which are more than capable of shooting down any nuclear weapon headed our way. Secondly, what nation would be stupid enough to 'nuke' another country, knowing it would be an act of 'suicide!' Pakistan possesses nuclear weapons and if any country were evil enough to begin a nuclear war, it would be them. Yet they haven't. That doesn't mean I 'trust' them. But I sure as hell would trust Iran a more civilized nation than Pakistan which is like a country still living in the Dark ages, yet with nuclear capabilities.
The simple fact of the matter is this. This planet is run by a group of the most corrupt, wicked persons anyone has ever known. 'They' have made it abundantly clear that they believe in 'population control' (depopulation), and that they are NOT in favor of more nations becoming 'energy independent!' Bottom line. THAT is the true reason why its okay for us and a few others to have nuclear materials, while 'others' cannot.
Learn about 'zero industrial growth' which is promoted by the elites who pull the strings for the 99 percent of the rest of those living upon this planet. Read the book 'Committee of 300' by Dr John Coleman. And there is plenty of other material and documented proof of what I am stating here in this post. Why do you think Africa has been entirely decimated from its natural resources, while leaving its rightful owners of the land living in tiny 'mud huts?'
See if a country can have its own nuclear material, it could become an 'indepenant nation' without the need of having to turn to other countries. So in essence, it boils down to keeping other countries down and living in poverty, with the expectation that those living under those oppressive conditions remain in that state, and eventually become extinct. Is that humane? Look at a statement former president Obama made on a visit to where his very ancestors came from, "you shouldn't own air-conditioning." And I could go on.
I highly recommend to anyone doubting or in disagreement with anything I've written here to read 'The Committee of 300' by John Coleman, and tell me who 'incorrect' you think my comments are. It's for the very same reasons that people are literally starving to death in certain parts of the world, and yet some have more money than they could ever spend in a lifetime. And not only them, but their children and grand-children. Is it any wonder why the Bible (whether you believe in it or not) says, 'it is easier for a poor man to enter into heaven than a rich man.'
'Greed.' Bottom line.
Speaking of 'greed,' stay tuned to this blog for my thoughts about the 'holiday season.' I am most certainly not against Christmas, but I am totally opposed to the hyper-commercialization of this time of the year, so much so I find it disgusting! And unfortunately the older I get, the less I enjoy time of the year. Then again, is it any wonder why so many more 'suicides' occur over the holiday season?
PS, Is this 'demonization' about the crime rate in Chicago being blown out of proportion for other nefarious reasons? Hint: calling in UN peacekeepers, seems like martial law to me. Not to mention the creation of a 'police state,' and worse.
PSS, as I write this I have Fox News playing in front of me, and in between all of Fox and Friends' stupid comments and antics, they seem to really be pushing this idea of having UN Peacekeepers in Chicago, as though the city is just totally 'out of control!' Be afraid, be very, very afraid! I can only imagine were I not living in the Chicagoland area, how this corporate media whore aka Fox News would have me believing Chicago is 'soo dangerous!'
And as with many famous cities, Chicago is a big travel destination for tourists from around the world. I cannot believe its mayor (Rahm 'Bozo' Emmanuel) wouldn't be somewhat irritated by this type of coverage. I know I sure am. And I don't even live within the city. But hey, I don't have 'dual-citizenship' as does Emmanuel. He could just hop a plane and flee back to 'Israel.' Goes to show you just how much this a-hole truly gives a damn about Chicago. But, he is the personification of a Zionist. Need I say more?
This blog covers how society is declining and taking not only America down, but the world in general. We're headed down the slippery road leading to tyranny. This is being done via any number of ways, the loss of our identity, attacks on culture, history, and of course politics. Our governments are spying on us, our freedoms are being eradicated, truth is being suppressed. While times may look bleak, good always prevails in the end!
Showing posts with label trump administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trump administration. Show all posts
Friday, December 15, 2017
Friday, August 4, 2017
McMaster dismisses another Flynn hire from National Security Council
What is all the 'drama' going on in the Trump administration? In this article, former general, McMaster (whom Trump himself is not particularly close to) has fired another former Flynn hire.
McMaster being yet another one of these 'bald men' whom appear to belong to some type of 'cult' in D.C. This seems to have begun, or at the least comes out of the Obama administration. Former Obama CIA director Tom Brennon (pictured prior to 'baldness here') seems to have started this 'fad,' of that is what you'd call this. But make no mistake, there are a lot of 'mysterious bald men' in high positions in Washington D.C. Always, think outside the box.
Always, 'question everything!'
Amid all the other 'chaos' that's been an ongoing issue, we have McMaster whom also is reportedly at odds with several of Trump's cabinet officials. In one report, Defense secretary Mattis had 'intervene' in a dispute between McMaster and Trump adviser Stephen Bannon according to this report. Yet, McMaster is someone who's own job just may be in jeopardy.
Not long after Trump assembled his WH cabinet, many immediately questioned some of these decisions. Rightfully so, I would add. Trump ran and entered the WH with the promise or perhaps more appropriately on the slogan to "Drain the swamp!" Instead, it would appear to be the opposite, Trump had 'invited the swamp' straight into his cabinet!
There's not much that can be said about this, without delving into deep 'speculation,' of which I choose not to indulge myself in (for this post anyway). I'll just leave this as being somewhat 'suspicious.' Having followed previous administrations, and having studied US history, there is an old saying in Washington, and it goes like this, "nothing in politics happens by coincidence."
Yet, having said that, there surely is a lot going on in Trump's administration that can't help but leaving many to scratch their heads in wonder. Is this how things will continue? Or is this merely the result of an 'inexperienced person' who has just become president of the United States? I'll let you decide. Personally, I would say the answer lies somewhere in the middle.
McMaster being yet another one of these 'bald men' whom appear to belong to some type of 'cult' in D.C. This seems to have begun, or at the least comes out of the Obama administration. Former Obama CIA director Tom Brennon (pictured prior to 'baldness here') seems to have started this 'fad,' of that is what you'd call this. But make no mistake, there are a lot of 'mysterious bald men' in high positions in Washington D.C. Always, think outside the box.
Always, 'question everything!'
Amid all the other 'chaos' that's been an ongoing issue, we have McMaster whom also is reportedly at odds with several of Trump's cabinet officials. In one report, Defense secretary Mattis had 'intervene' in a dispute between McMaster and Trump adviser Stephen Bannon according to this report. Yet, McMaster is someone who's own job just may be in jeopardy.
Not long after Trump assembled his WH cabinet, many immediately questioned some of these decisions. Rightfully so, I would add. Trump ran and entered the WH with the promise or perhaps more appropriately on the slogan to "Drain the swamp!" Instead, it would appear to be the opposite, Trump had 'invited the swamp' straight into his cabinet!
There's not much that can be said about this, without delving into deep 'speculation,' of which I choose not to indulge myself in (for this post anyway). I'll just leave this as being somewhat 'suspicious.' Having followed previous administrations, and having studied US history, there is an old saying in Washington, and it goes like this, "nothing in politics happens by coincidence."
Yet, having said that, there surely is a lot going on in Trump's administration that can't help but leaving many to scratch their heads in wonder. Is this how things will continue? Or is this merely the result of an 'inexperienced person' who has just become president of the United States? I'll let you decide. Personally, I would say the answer lies somewhere in the middle.
Monday, January 23, 2017
On Seeing All the Changes in a New Presidential Administration
Am currently watching my second 'press conference,' watched the very first one over the weekend, and it was amazing to see how Trump's administration handle to press who were ALL against him, even to the 'low point' of attacking his wife and youngest son. He took 'no questions,' and basically laid down the law, letting the press know, 'we won't accept false media reports.' Wow!
Talk about a stark contrast to a former president, who was 'in bed with the media.' I'm sure everyone who followed this election were all cheering!
Currently, on I suppose you'd call the 'first official' press conference, I don't see the press secretary calling upon those sitting in the front, 'first,' as has been the norm. Some within the media already are comparing Trump to former president Nixon, whom did not 'trust the media.'
That is not a 'fair comparison,' as Nixon was not 'distrustful' of the media for the same reasons. Nixon was a president who had things to 'hide,' to make such a comparison, is yet another 'false assumption.'
You can just 'feel in the air' a 'fresh feeling in America' once Obama left office! I don't think I'm alone in saying as much. It's as though a 'cloud' came off the skies of America, and the sun is shining again. It's morning in America again!
...couldn't have happened soon enough!
Talk about a stark contrast to a former president, who was 'in bed with the media.' I'm sure everyone who followed this election were all cheering!
Currently, on I suppose you'd call the 'first official' press conference, I don't see the press secretary calling upon those sitting in the front, 'first,' as has been the norm. Some within the media already are comparing Trump to former president Nixon, whom did not 'trust the media.'
That is not a 'fair comparison,' as Nixon was not 'distrustful' of the media for the same reasons. Nixon was a president who had things to 'hide,' to make such a comparison, is yet another 'false assumption.'
You can just 'feel in the air' a 'fresh feeling in America' once Obama left office! I don't think I'm alone in saying as much. It's as though a 'cloud' came off the skies of America, and the sun is shining again. It's morning in America again!
...couldn't have happened soon enough!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)