As some may know, I don't care very much for VP Mike Pence. The reason I don't trust the man is because though he claims to be a 'Christian,' he is a globalist! While one may 'consider' themselves 'Christian,' I don't see being a globalist as being compatible with being a globalist! Nonetheless, one of the red flags is the fact of having heard countless times how 'well respected he is across the aisles.'
The only other politician I ever heard that about was former president George H. W. Bush, or Bush Sr, a huge globalist and also a big time occultist who comes from a shady family with a sinister background.
Then we have George W. Bush who 'fooled Christians' into voting for him, and also starting his bogus 'faith based initiative,' which is nothing short of a ecumenical consortium, which is yet another globalist front. So he does not fool me. Also, 9/11 happened under his watch, and 9/11 was a major 'inside job,' with trails leading to our 'best friends' in the middle east, Israel, and Saudi Arabia.
So I'm tired of politicians pandering to Christians solely for their votes. I'm also fed up with 'Christian bashing,' while Islam gets a pass in the media and elsewhere. Whether you like it or not, it was 'Islam' who declared war on America- NOT Christianity! Nor ANY other religion, for that matter. And that includes multiple 'terrorist attacks' upon the West. Christianity is NOT the enemy of the West, nor are any other religions.
I post this only because of Joy Behar from The View who recently made fun of VP Mike Pence's faith (Christianity). Again, I don't even like Pence, as I don't believe he's anything but a globalist waiting in the wings to resume and possibly undo all the good Trump has done. I have never trusted the man, even prior to him becoming vice-president, knowing he's friends with Sen John McCain, another 'traitor' to America, and Pence has also 'praised' McCain on multiple occasions. Look at some of the comments Pence has made during his political career! Look at his comments especially right after 9/11, and as governor of Indiana with respect to the 'peace loving' religion of Islam. You cannot place Islam on the same level as that of Christianity, nor any other non-violent religion and do so with a straight face. To do so is a total joke.
Joy Behar (The View)
They say 'history repeats itself.' Some of you who really follow politics, and are old enough to remember the era of Ronald Reagan may recall, or know that former president Ronald Reagan was totally opposed to having anything to do with George W. Bush, and especially did not want him on the ticket with him as vice-president. Yet, at the GOP convention in 1980, coming out of that convention, George W. Bush did indeed 'mysteriously' become Reagan's VP! Then, in a matter of months after Reagan having been sworn in as president, an assassination was attempted upon Reagan's life. Coincidence? As someone famously said, 'there are no coincidences in politics.' Well, I take it further in my belief that there are no coincidences- period. As some JFK historians may know, George H. W. Bush has been implicated as having had some connection to the assassination of JFK. Though not 'officially' proven, many do hold to this opinion. And time may prove them correct.
Nonetheless, I give credit when credit is due. And to that end, I believe VP Mike Pence's insistence that Behar who did call Pence to personally apologize (though probably not 'made' to apologize) did do so. Yet, to Pence's credit he insisted that Behar apologize in public to the Americans who hold to a Christian worldview. For that reason alone, I give Pence credit. Here is the apology. Whether it is 'sincere,' I don't think it is! She doesn't even 'say' what she's apologizing for, or to who. She simply says, 'I apologize.' Sincere?
This blog covers how society is declining and taking not only America down, but the world in general. We're headed down the slippery road leading to tyranny. This is being done via any number of ways, the loss of our identity, attacks on culture, history, and of course politics. Our governments are spying on us, our freedoms are being eradicated, truth is being suppressed. While times may look bleak, good always prevails in the end!
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
Monday, September 11, 2017
Modern pilgrims: More people are traveling for spirituality
With today being yet another somber anniversary in America of a day this country will never forget (9/11). And a day after yet more Americans suffered devastation from Mother Nature, Americans have been through a lot. We are being tested. Some are even asking whether 'God is causing all this?'
While I will address the last question in a post later today, this post is about 'Modern Pilgrims.' In this article linked here, it speaks about how though 'traditional religion' is on the decline in many countries,' people are very much seeking 'spirituality.'
While most of Europe has already seen its churches emptied, America appears to be the 'last country' that still embraces Christianity. In many parts of America Christianity is still very much flourishing. Yet in other parts of the country, the opposite is occurring. So there is a divide, a shift happening in America and it's not based solely along political lines.
While I am not one of those whom claim that America was 'founded as a Christian nation,' some historians and ministers still do cling to this notion. I have looked into this personally because you can't always believe what you hear or read, especially in the day and age in which we now live. This is why I do much of my own research, so I can come up with the conclusions based on the evidence that I personally find, as opposed to leaving it to others.
So while churches are indeed going through a transformation, and whether a person attends a 'traditional church,' make no mistake the churches in America are not what they once stood for, or even believed in many cases. While I grew up attending church, I personally do not attend any church, as there isn't any that I agree with. I'm sure there are many others like me who have left the church.
And yet though I have left the church, the reality is the reverse...as I find it and view it as the church has 'left me!' Same can be said with many whom have been affiliated with a particular political party. Times are changing. Whether this is for the worse, or the better, it is what we decide to make of it as an individual, and as a nation. There will always be those among us who 'believe' in something greater than ourselves, as there will be those who do not.
Both sides have their convictions and whether you agree or disagree, it is to be respected. I can understand why a person cannot believe in a God. While I may not agree with them, it is for me to respect their convictions, and leave them be. I certainly do not agree with Islam having read a lot about it after the events of 9/11. But, if that is what someone wants to believe, that is their right. Of course, using a religion as an excuse to commit 'terror' is quite another road, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
But never mind 'organized religion.' Spirituality is what we're dealing with. I have always felt the need to believe in 'something.' I have always been a Believer, as I know there is something greater out there with an infinite wisdom who has created us, and this earth, and we are not here on accident, nor did this world 'create itself.' While some would disagree, that's fine. I would wager more people believe as I do, than those who do not.
While 'organized religion' basically no longer suits my needs, which is a shame. That is what it was intended to do. But man being man, they have over time crept into far too many religious systems, and corrupted it for their own personal gains. While its not an accurate reflection of the core value of the religion, it does tarnish the image of a particular religion. For example, there are far too many 'greedy preachers' out there looking out more for themselves, than for those whom they claim to help.
This has become far too commonplace, and such persons ruin it for other. So many are now seeking spirituality as a personal means of staying 'connected' to what they believe in. This may be dangerous spiritually speaking, but it is a journey, and this is where the idea of being a 'pilgrim' derives from. Throughout the centuries, many (as now) have felt the need to travel to various 'religious destinations' in their personal quest for a belief system, to confirm their belief system, or to 'test' various belief systems. But as they saying goes, it's not the 'destination' that matters as much as it is what lays within the 'journey.' It is within the confines of the journey that many will accept, or reject certain ideals which they may have been taught, or will come to accept as a result of personal experience.
"Pilgrims" have been around for centuries. And the idea is making a comeback. While many cannot afford to travel to exotic countries, one can take a pilgrimage right where they live. There is an inherent difference between 'religion' and 'spirituality.' And while the two are not always mutually exclusive, they can add to the other. On the contrary, spirituality can also determine whether a person decides to belong to a 'organized religion,' or decides to follow one on their own.
While I will address the last question in a post later today, this post is about 'Modern Pilgrims.' In this article linked here, it speaks about how though 'traditional religion' is on the decline in many countries,' people are very much seeking 'spirituality.'
While most of Europe has already seen its churches emptied, America appears to be the 'last country' that still embraces Christianity. In many parts of America Christianity is still very much flourishing. Yet in other parts of the country, the opposite is occurring. So there is a divide, a shift happening in America and it's not based solely along political lines.
While I am not one of those whom claim that America was 'founded as a Christian nation,' some historians and ministers still do cling to this notion. I have looked into this personally because you can't always believe what you hear or read, especially in the day and age in which we now live. This is why I do much of my own research, so I can come up with the conclusions based on the evidence that I personally find, as opposed to leaving it to others.
So while churches are indeed going through a transformation, and whether a person attends a 'traditional church,' make no mistake the churches in America are not what they once stood for, or even believed in many cases. While I grew up attending church, I personally do not attend any church, as there isn't any that I agree with. I'm sure there are many others like me who have left the church.
And yet though I have left the church, the reality is the reverse...as I find it and view it as the church has 'left me!' Same can be said with many whom have been affiliated with a particular political party. Times are changing. Whether this is for the worse, or the better, it is what we decide to make of it as an individual, and as a nation. There will always be those among us who 'believe' in something greater than ourselves, as there will be those who do not.
Both sides have their convictions and whether you agree or disagree, it is to be respected. I can understand why a person cannot believe in a God. While I may not agree with them, it is for me to respect their convictions, and leave them be. I certainly do not agree with Islam having read a lot about it after the events of 9/11. But, if that is what someone wants to believe, that is their right. Of course, using a religion as an excuse to commit 'terror' is quite another road, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
But never mind 'organized religion.' Spirituality is what we're dealing with. I have always felt the need to believe in 'something.' I have always been a Believer, as I know there is something greater out there with an infinite wisdom who has created us, and this earth, and we are not here on accident, nor did this world 'create itself.' While some would disagree, that's fine. I would wager more people believe as I do, than those who do not.
While 'organized religion' basically no longer suits my needs, which is a shame. That is what it was intended to do. But man being man, they have over time crept into far too many religious systems, and corrupted it for their own personal gains. While its not an accurate reflection of the core value of the religion, it does tarnish the image of a particular religion. For example, there are far too many 'greedy preachers' out there looking out more for themselves, than for those whom they claim to help.
This has become far too commonplace, and such persons ruin it for other. So many are now seeking spirituality as a personal means of staying 'connected' to what they believe in. This may be dangerous spiritually speaking, but it is a journey, and this is where the idea of being a 'pilgrim' derives from. Throughout the centuries, many (as now) have felt the need to travel to various 'religious destinations' in their personal quest for a belief system, to confirm their belief system, or to 'test' various belief systems. But as they saying goes, it's not the 'destination' that matters as much as it is what lays within the 'journey.' It is within the confines of the journey that many will accept, or reject certain ideals which they may have been taught, or will come to accept as a result of personal experience.
"Pilgrims" have been around for centuries. And the idea is making a comeback. While many cannot afford to travel to exotic countries, one can take a pilgrimage right where they live. There is an inherent difference between 'religion' and 'spirituality.' And while the two are not always mutually exclusive, they can add to the other. On the contrary, spirituality can also determine whether a person decides to belong to a 'organized religion,' or decides to follow one on their own.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Obama's 'Failed Nuke Agreement with Iran and His Comments on the Anniversary of the "Abolition of Slavery"
Obama 'trusts' Iran with nuclear weapons, and they've 'thumbed their noses right at America by having already broken a UN agreement against firing 'ballistic missiles.' Just goes to show how 'pro-Muslim' Obama is. But should you believe that 'only' endangers the state of Israel (whom Iranian leaders have already been on record as calling for the obliteration of Israel and the Jews), then take this 'remark' made just today at the 'Anniversary of the Abolition of Slavery.'
Obama still clings to the mistaken notion that there is 'nothing wrong' with continuing to allow Muslims to enter into America as did millions of immigrants did during the late 1800's into the early 1900's.. I'm sorry, but there is NO 'comparison' to be made or had! And no, this is not being 'bigoted,' or "Islamaphobic." It's called having 'common sense!!!' Islam 'mind you,' declared war on America- not the other way around. The number of attacks against American interests both here and abroad (mind you 9/11), have proven time and time again, they (Muslims) and by the way, there is 'no such term as a "moderate Muslim" in the middle-east, per their own Imams, and clerics. It's an 'entirely' Western created phrase, THEY have been the 'aggressor,' or a number of reasons which could be an another blog topic in itself. Nevertheless, Obama likens the 'immigration' of Muslims as that of those who came before. There is NO comparison. Absolutely none. Not one of those 'ethnic groups' of immigrants came here with an 'agenda' nor had they attacked America in advance of their arrival. NONE.
Secondly, try this on for size, for all the fools who are attacking Trump (and I am no fan of his, but he is saying what needs to be said)!. This is no different than if during WW2 after Germany had declared 'war' on America, we would have allowed "Nazi's and German's" to have continued to enter our borders! Did we allow such a thing? NO. Why? If you have to ask, I suppose you're one of the one's mocking Trump's statement on this very issue. How 'stupid' can 'stupid' be?
In WW2, it was Germany who declared war on America, and we did NOT allow any German's to come into our country during that period. So please explain to me, now that "Islam" has already 'long ago' declared war on America (ISIS, aka IS, aka ISIL, aka Al-Qaeda), same difference, would it 'now' be acceptable to allow a 'sworn enemy' to our way of life, et al, and just accept them as 'immigrants" who came here (peacefully) as the ones I'd already referred to? You may say, 'well, not all Muslims are terrorists, but oh how funny it is that ALL terrorists are Muslims? All the one's who are stirring up the stability and taking lives, hitting 'soft-targets' let's not forget, being the cowards they are
. What is wrong with just putting on the 'brakes' until things cool down (which they won't, short of Islam getting its Caliphate), not to mention they're planning on putting up their flag on top of the White House? Do you think the American people during WW2 would have not had the same sentiment as I and many others do? I don't care how you want to 'slice' it, there is a 'war' going on between "Islam, Christianity and the Western Civilization as a whole.
Oh, but today's culture has been saturated with this 'political correctness,' which is nothing short of 'verbal fascism,' that people don't want to be labeled as 'anything by anyone.' (the very same 'tolerant people' who HATE "Christians" and 'thinking for yourself!' HELLO! That's the cowardly, spineless way out the PC crowd has created to 'go along, to get along.' Unless, as stated, you have to 'disagree with them!' Then see just how 'tolerant' these fools are.
. We have to take drastic measures against drastic people and times. If not now, then when? When they've outnumbered us (higher population growth numbers- fact); once Obama has stripped American's of their God given right to bear arms under the 2nd amendment? And lets not forget the city of Detroit a shining example of political correctness having had its way, and now Detroit is not much different than any middle-eastern city. Is that what you want? Really? Is this 'bigoted?' Is this 'Islamophobic?' I don't think so. It's good old 'common sense! Something our leaders and 'social engineers lack, but they have their agenda, and too many are asleep at the wheel, to know just 'what' that agenda is!
I could say a whole lot more on this. For one I have studied the 'religion' (so-called) of Islam. It is NOT a 'religion.' It is a 'political system' steeped in 'Sharia law,' and those who refuse to comply with it (Sharia law) will severely regret not adhering to my words, and those of Trump's.
Just for the record, I am not 'anti-Muslim,' nor anti-any race! Did people 'claim racism' against not allowing German (and Italians) into America during WW2? NO. So this has absolutely nothing to do with 'race, or religion.' But it does have everything to do with a way of life, a 'political system' which seeks to overthrow our American way of life. It's that's being 'racist or bigoted,' I stand and plead guilty- proudly.
I would advise all those in favor of Obama's comments to look into the 'religion' of Islam. Particularly "Sharia law," and how it (their 'sacred books and 'hadiths') speak openly about how to deal with the 'infidels,' ie you and I and anyone who is and will not 'convert' to the 'peaceful religion of Islam.' No Germans or Italians were allowed into America during WW2, nor should any Islamist be allowed to enter America during our "war on terror," which truth be told is a 'war against Islam.'
Let FREEDOM REIGN, and may history PROVE Obama a "LIAR!"
Obama still clings to the mistaken notion that there is 'nothing wrong' with continuing to allow Muslims to enter into America as did millions of immigrants did during the late 1800's into the early 1900's.. I'm sorry, but there is NO 'comparison' to be made or had! And no, this is not being 'bigoted,' or "Islamaphobic." It's called having 'common sense!!!' Islam 'mind you,' declared war on America- not the other way around. The number of attacks against American interests both here and abroad (mind you 9/11), have proven time and time again, they (Muslims) and by the way, there is 'no such term as a "moderate Muslim" in the middle-east, per their own Imams, and clerics. It's an 'entirely' Western created phrase, THEY have been the 'aggressor,' or a number of reasons which could be an another blog topic in itself. Nevertheless, Obama likens the 'immigration' of Muslims as that of those who came before. There is NO comparison. Absolutely none. Not one of those 'ethnic groups' of immigrants came here with an 'agenda' nor had they attacked America in advance of their arrival. NONE.
Secondly, try this on for size, for all the fools who are attacking Trump (and I am no fan of his, but he is saying what needs to be said)!. This is no different than if during WW2 after Germany had declared 'war' on America, we would have allowed "Nazi's and German's" to have continued to enter our borders! Did we allow such a thing? NO. Why? If you have to ask, I suppose you're one of the one's mocking Trump's statement on this very issue. How 'stupid' can 'stupid' be?
In WW2, it was Germany who declared war on America, and we did NOT allow any German's to come into our country during that period. So please explain to me, now that "Islam" has already 'long ago' declared war on America (ISIS, aka IS, aka ISIL, aka Al-Qaeda), same difference, would it 'now' be acceptable to allow a 'sworn enemy' to our way of life, et al, and just accept them as 'immigrants" who came here (peacefully) as the ones I'd already referred to? You may say, 'well, not all Muslims are terrorists, but oh how funny it is that ALL terrorists are Muslims? All the one's who are stirring up the stability and taking lives, hitting 'soft-targets' let's not forget, being the cowards they are
. What is wrong with just putting on the 'brakes' until things cool down (which they won't, short of Islam getting its Caliphate), not to mention they're planning on putting up their flag on top of the White House? Do you think the American people during WW2 would have not had the same sentiment as I and many others do? I don't care how you want to 'slice' it, there is a 'war' going on between "Islam, Christianity and the Western Civilization as a whole.
Oh, but today's culture has been saturated with this 'political correctness,' which is nothing short of 'verbal fascism,' that people don't want to be labeled as 'anything by anyone.' (the very same 'tolerant people' who HATE "Christians" and 'thinking for yourself!' HELLO! That's the cowardly, spineless way out the PC crowd has created to 'go along, to get along.' Unless, as stated, you have to 'disagree with them!' Then see just how 'tolerant' these fools are.
. We have to take drastic measures against drastic people and times. If not now, then when? When they've outnumbered us (higher population growth numbers- fact); once Obama has stripped American's of their God given right to bear arms under the 2nd amendment? And lets not forget the city of Detroit a shining example of political correctness having had its way, and now Detroit is not much different than any middle-eastern city. Is that what you want? Really? Is this 'bigoted?' Is this 'Islamophobic?' I don't think so. It's good old 'common sense! Something our leaders and 'social engineers lack, but they have their agenda, and too many are asleep at the wheel, to know just 'what' that agenda is!
I could say a whole lot more on this. For one I have studied the 'religion' (so-called) of Islam. It is NOT a 'religion.' It is a 'political system' steeped in 'Sharia law,' and those who refuse to comply with it (Sharia law) will severely regret not adhering to my words, and those of Trump's.
Just for the record, I am not 'anti-Muslim,' nor anti-any race! Did people 'claim racism' against not allowing German (and Italians) into America during WW2? NO. So this has absolutely nothing to do with 'race, or religion.' But it does have everything to do with a way of life, a 'political system' which seeks to overthrow our American way of life. It's that's being 'racist or bigoted,' I stand and plead guilty- proudly.
I would advise all those in favor of Obama's comments to look into the 'religion' of Islam. Particularly "Sharia law," and how it (their 'sacred books and 'hadiths') speak openly about how to deal with the 'infidels,' ie you and I and anyone who is and will not 'convert' to the 'peaceful religion of Islam.' No Germans or Italians were allowed into America during WW2, nor should any Islamist be allowed to enter America during our "war on terror," which truth be told is a 'war against Islam.'
Let FREEDOM REIGN, and may history PROVE Obama a "LIAR!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

