Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Exclusive: Read the Inauguration Day letter Obama left for Trump

Inauguration Day Letter Obama Left for Trump

While the contents of these letters has never generally been disclosed, this has now changed (at least to my memory, or knowledge).

As many may be aware its a tradition for the former president to leave a written letter to their successor. And while to my knowledge, I have never heard what the contents of these letters contained.

Now, Trump has read for us all, the public and media, just exactly what his predecessor Barack Obama had written to Trump. And as it turns out, apparently other president's letter's have been made publicly known

This article speaks of the letter going back to Clinton, which he left for incoming president George W. Bush, to the present. This is an interesting look at what is said between president's, from the out-going, to the in-coming.

What makes this 'letter' all the more interesting is that unlike previous one's which have been left, we know that during the 2016 presidential election, there were some back and forth comments made by then candidate Trump to president Obama, and vice-versa which at times were heated.

So while you would think this would be one letter that the public may have been kept in the dark about, it has not. It also give a glimpse into the mind of an outgoing president, which is fascinating in itself. You can just imagine all the emotions being poured into such a letter under normal circumstances, but we all know the 2016 presidential election was anything but normal.

Also, as someone who follows the news and politics as I do, this is the first time I had ever heard of these letters being made available to the public. So enjoy t. he read. Also, imagine the kind of letter that Trump may leave, especially should he turn out to be a 'one-term' president...

...matter of fact, instead of a written letter, maybe Trump will leave a 'Twitter message (140 character or less) to his predecessor? That would be something, and I can hear the media reaction already. Then again, it doesn't matter what he does, the media is going to be very critical about it.                                                                                                                        

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

Oh gee, but what will the 'commies' on the left talk about? Here's a big exception I take with this article,

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

Unlike both Clinton and Obama, especially the latter, republicans didn't go after the democrats for the right reasons. Clinton could have been 'impeached' for having given the Chinese 'high security secrets' from Los Alamos base which gave the Chinese the ability to improve their nuclear capabilities. Chinese agent?

As for Obama, there is STILL so much we do NOT know about the guy, and were congress not full of 'corrupt or compromised' miscreants, an investigation would have been launched showing god only knows what about this 'Manchurian creep!' Secondly, Obama trampled all over the Constitution taking many 'illegal acts' and doing what he pleased. Plus BOTH Clinton's and Obama used the IRS as a 'weapon' against their political adversaries.

Being 'non-partisan,' as for Bush Jr, I'd say he should have been 'impeached' over 9/11. But of course wasn't even a thought because 'both' political parties benefited. Also, it would appear as though Bush did indeed 'steal' the election from Al Gore (whom I cannot stand, but I'm not partisan).

So, Greenwald so much for the 'fake accusations,' more like a weak spine on behalf of both sides of the aisle when it comes to going after corruption.  And shame on the 'media' for all this Russian 'fake news!' Should civil unrest occur I would say the government should be at their front doors taking prisoners there! We all know the media is 'propaganda.' Well, and who was it that did away with the Smith-Mundt act just before leaving office? Who was it that 'changed' who had access to 'security intel?' Obama! Need I say more? Oh, I won't even bring up the fact Obama is actively working like a good little 'comrade,' to do all he can to undermine President Trump.